Disease Madness – What is Happening? Part 2 [Reposted]

From original article dated 15th August 2022

This is part 2 of a 3-part series of articles I wrote in 2022 that remain pertinent to the current times.

Here’s part 1 in case you missed it.

In part 1 of Disease Madness – What Is Happening?, I discussed the ‘diseases’ reported by the WHO on their Disease Outbreak News (DONS) web page since 1st June 2022. But these were not all new ‘outbreaks’; some were referred to as ‘situation updates’; in other words, they had begun some time earlier.

However, perusal of the DONS web pages from the beginning of 2020 reveals a rather large number of ‘outbreaks’ of many different diseases in various different countries or sometime multiple countries. Again, these are not all ‘new’ outbreaks; they too include ‘situation updates’.

This is the 2020 ‘outbreaks’ list:

• Ebola

• MERS-CoV

• Measles

• Lassa fever

• Yellow fever

• Dengue fever

• Dracunculiasis

• Influenza A(H1N2)

• Plague

• Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2

• Monkeypox

• Oropouch virus disease

• Mayaro virus disease

• Rift Valley fever

• Avian influenza A(H5N1)

• Acute hepatitis E

• Last, but not least – COVID 19 was reported as ‘global’

This is the 2021 ‘outbreaks’ list:

• Cholera

• Influenza A(H3N2)

• Human infection with avian influenza A(H5N8)

• Human infection with avian influenza A(H10N3)

• Marburg virus disease

• Human infection with avian influenza A(H5N1)

• Meningitis

• Nipah virus disease

• Zika virus disease

This is the 2022 ‘outbreaks’ list to the end of May 2022:

• Influenza A(H5)

• Wild poliovirus type 1

• Extensively drug-resistant Shigella sonnei infections

• Acute hepatitis of unknown aetiology

• Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 3

• Multi-country outbreak of Salmonella Typhimunium linked to chocolate products

• Japanese encephalitis

• Avian Influenza A(H3N8)

• Influenza A(H12N1)

The ‘outbreaks’ that are claimed to have occurred during June 2022 were listed in Disease Madness part 1, with the addition of 2 ‘situation updates’, one of which relates to Ebola, which is discussed later in this article.

The main reason for providing this list of ‘outbreaks’ is to highlight that, contrary to many reports, ‘Covid-19’ is not the only alleged ‘disease’ claimed to be affecting people in various parts of the world since the beginning of 2020.

It should be noted that the vast majority of these so-called ‘diseases’ are said to be caused by ‘viruses’; but no particle that has been labelled a ‘virus’ has ever been proven to be the cause of any disease, as discussed in many previous articles as well as our book.

This again raises the obvious question: what is happening?

It is abundantly clear that there is a massive drive to perpetuate the belief that there is a veritable ‘zoo’ of pathogenic microorganisms ‘out there’ to infect us; thereby making us all ill or even killing us. The reference to a ‘zoo’ is also pertinent because many of these alleged ‘diseases’ are claimed to be transmissible by animals of one sort or another. However, yet again, there is no evidence that this is the case.

This drive is clearly seen in the ‘information’ promulgated by the mainstream medical establishment as demonstrated by an undated page on the WHO website (accessed on 12th August 2022) entitled Prioritizing diseases for research and development in emergency contexts that states,

“Worldwide, the number of potential pathogens is very large, while the resources for disease research and development (R&D) is limited. To ensure efforts under WHO’s R&D Blueprint are focused and productive, a list of diseases and pathogens are prioritized for R&D in public health emergency contexts.”

The article continues,

“At present, the priority diseases are:
– COVID-19
– Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever
– Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus disease
– Lassa fever
– Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
– Nipah and henipaviral diseases
– Rift Valley fever
– Zika
– “Disease X”*

This is followed by the comment that,

“This is not an exhaustive list, nor does it indicate the most likely causes of the next epidemic.”

‘Disease X’ is described on the web page as follows,

“Disease X represents the knowledge that a serious international epidemic could be caused by a pathogen currently unknown to cause human disease. The R&D Blueprint explicitly seeks to enable early cross-cutting R&D preparedness that is also relevant for an unknown “Disease X”.

This is not the only publication that refers to this mystery disease; as can be seen by a March 2018 article entitled, Disease X: The Next Pandemic, which states that,

“Disease X is the mysterious name given to the very serious threat that unknown viruses pose to human health. Disease X is on a short list of pathogens deemed a top priority for research by the World Health Organization, alongside known killers like SARS and Ebola.”

The authors of these articles would seem to be gifted clairvoyants. Not only are they able to predict that there will be a ‘next pandemic’, but they are also able to know what the cause is likely to be!! They also, paradoxically, seem to know about ‘unknown’ viruses.

Despite being listed as if they are separate conditions, Ebola and Marburg are claimed to be ‘clinically similar’ yet caused by different ‘viruses’ of the same family, known as ‘filoviruses’. The ‘viruses’ that are claimed to cause Ebola and Marburg are described on the page entitled Filovirus on the Science Direct website as being,

“…among the most dangerous causes of viral hemorrhagic fever, with reported case fatality rates frequently over 50%.”

The WHO 4th July 2022 situation report about ‘Ebola’ states that,

“Between 23 April and 3 July 2022, a total of five (four confirmed and one probable) cases of EVD, including five deaths (case fatality ratio 100%), were reported from three health areas in Equateur province.”

One of the measures used to combat this outbreak involved vaccination with Ervebo. According to the package insert, which is available from the FDA website (see references at the foot of this article),

“The vaccine virus is grown in serum-free Vero cell cultures. The virus is harvested from the cell culture medium, purified, formulated with stabilizer solution, filled into vials and stored frozen.”

Vero cells are monkey kidney cells, which are commonly used in the virology cell culture experiments that are claimed to ‘isolate’ viruses. But, as has been repeatedly shown, these experiments do no such thing. There is no evidence that any so-called ‘virus’ has ever been ‘isolated’ in the true sense of the word. For more information on the problem with ‘virus isolation’, please refer to my earlier article, COVID: An Overview, (which you can also find linked from part 1 of this series). Equally importantly is that many toxic substances are used in these cell culture experiments that remain in the ‘culture medium’ that is used as the basis for vaccines.

An ‘outbreak’ of Marburg disease was reported on the WHO DONS web page as having occurred in August 2021. The report referred to a single person with an allegedly confirmed case of ‘Marburg’ disease, but who died. The web page also states that,

“This is the first known case of Marburg virus disease in Guinea and in West Africa.”

Interestingly, on 18th July 2022, an article appeared on the BBC website with the title, Ghana confirms first cases of deadly Marburg virus. As occurred with the case in 2021, the patients both died. The article also states that there is no ‘treatment’ yet for this deadly disease.

The reason for highlighting these two ‘diseases’ is because they are both considered to have a high fatality rate; to be caused by ‘viruses’; to be spread to humans by animals, and bats in particular; to be ‘priority diseases’ and to occur in Africa.

The first point to emphasise is that there is no evidence that these ‘diseases’ are caused by viruses or that they are transmissible to humans by animals, which inevitably raises the question of what does cause Ebola and Marburg? The problem is that there is no single simple answer to this question. But, as with all diseases, there will be many contributory factors that will always involve a varying combination of what we refer to in our book as the ‘four factors’. The most likely candidates for the cases of Ebola and Marburg in African countries will include toxins of some description, poor nutrition, a lack of clean water and poor sanitation.

Another disease that is claimed to be a significant health problem in Africa is ‘malaria’, as can be seen by the July 2022 WHO Malaria fact sheet that states,

“The WHO African Region continues to carry a disproportionately high share of the global malaria burden.”

The fact sheet describes malaria as follows,

“Malaria is a life-threatening disease caused by parasites that are transmitted to people through the bites of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes. It is preventable and curable.”

Yet again, the main problem is that there is no evidence that ‘malaria’ occurs as described nor that it is transmitted to humans by mosquitoes. This topic is discussed in detail in our book, although some of the key points are discussed in this article.

First of all, it should be emphasised that ‘malaria’ is one of the key goals of the 2030 Agenda, as can be seen in SDG 3.3, which states the aim to,

“By 2030, end the epidemics of AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and neglected tropical diseases and combat hepatitis, water-borne diseases and other communicable diseases.”

In addition, the WHO report entitled Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016-2030 was first prepared in 2015 as was the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. However, the malaria report was updated in 2021. Under the heading Strategic Framework is the following,

“In order to accelerate progress towards elimination, WHO urges affected countries and the global malaria community to maximize the impact of existing life-saving interventions.”

The report then lists a number of pillars, the first of which states,

“Pillar 1. Ensure access to malaria prevention, diagnosis and treatment as part of universal health coverage.”

Also included in the same paragraph is the explanation of the measures that are claimed to prevent malaria,

“WHO recommends implementing two sets of interventions in a complementary way: (i) prevention strategies based on vector control, and, in certain settings and in some population groups, administration of chemoprevention…”

In other words, the core concern of the WHO is to implement intervention measures to treat or prevent ‘malaria’, but this would assume that they know the cause of this health problem; however, this is not the case. Unfortunately, their claims to providing ‘life-saving’ interventions are also unfounded.

Vector control involves the use of insecticides to kill the mosquitoes claimed to be the cause of malaria. These insecticides are used in two ways, ITNs (insecticide-treated nets) and IRS (indoor residual spraying). The most common insecticides used for these purposes are pyrethroids, which are known to be toxic.

The problem with these intervention measures is that the insecticides used will inevitably adversely affect human health as well as kill mosquitoes!

There are a number of ‘medicines’ used as chemoprevention, especially chloroquine and other similar substances, such as hydroxychloroquine. The ‘population groups’ most likely to be advised to take these toxic substances as preventives against malaria are explained in the Malaria report,

“WHO-recommended preventive treatment strategies against malaria presently include intermittent preventive treatment of pregnant women (IPTp), intermittent preventive treatment of infants (IPTi), and seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) for children under 6. These interventions are recommended in areas of moderate to high malaria transmission in sub-Saharan Africa, with SMC recommended only in areas of highly seasonal transmission across the Sahel subregion.”

The idea that pregnant women and young children need protection is not incorrect – but these women and children will not be protected through the administration of toxic ‘medicines’ that cannot prevent a ‘disease’ that has never been definitively proven to be caused by a parasite called Plasmodium falciparum nor transmitted mainly by the Anopheles mosquito.

A new addition to the arsenal in the fight against ‘malaria’ is a vaccine, as the WHO fact sheet explains,

“Since October 2021, WHO also recommends broad use of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine among children living in regions with moderate to high P. falciparum malaria transmission.”

As previously discussed, there is no evidence to support the idea that any vaccine can prevent any disease. There is, however, an abundance of evidence that all vaccines cause harm. So the question many people ought to be asking is: why are the people in Africa being targeted?

There are a few possible answers to this question. One of them involves the idea that the world is overpopulated and that the current rate of population growth is unsustainable; hence the 2030 Agenda promoting ‘sustainable development’. The problem is that there is absolutely no evidence that the world cannot support the existing population or even a greater population size; this theme will be continued in part 3 of this article series.

It should be abundantly clear from the foregoing that there are ongoing efforts to maintain the belief in the public mind of the existence of ‘dangerous infectious diseases’ that require treatments, ‘chemoprevention’ or vaccines. But these measures are all toxic and harmful to the human body, which means that they will only contribute to worsening health problems and never to their resolution.

It is for this reason that it is of such vital importance that people learn that this idea that they are being encouraged to believe is not based on any genuine scientific evidence.

Understanding this simple but fundamental point has two beneficial consequences; first of all, it eliminates the fear associated with the idea of such diseases and secondly, it stops people from submitting themselves to toxic treatments or toxic preventive measures or both.

Part 3 to follow…