Malicious Mosquitoes on the rampage in Europe?

Why you don’t need to be afraid

A recent BBC article entitled Tiger mosquitoes behind dengue fever rise in Europe proclaims in the opening paragraph that,

“An invasive species of mosquito has been found in 13 countries in the EU, including France, Spain and Greece, with experts linking their discovery to a rise in dengue fever in Europe.”

This article makes many claims that need to be exposed as unproven, or even disproven where relevant. Please don’t be fooled by the mention of ‘experts’.

Claim number 1 - Tiger mosquitoes spread disease.

Let’s start with their core claim,

“Tiger mosquitoes spread diseases such as dengue fever, chikungunya and Zika virus, which, until recently, were typically only present in parts of Africa, Asia and the Americas.”

Unsurprisingly, the WHO has an updated fact sheet about dengue fever; it’s called Dengue and severe dengue, just to make you feel really scared.

However, the very first ‘fact’ highlights the fundamental problem with this claim,

“Dengue is a viral infection transmitted to humans through the bite of infected mosquitoes.”

For anyone who still thinks that the ‘no virus’ position is not important, I would say that this clearly demonstrates that the relevance of that position extends far beyond the ‘Covid’ narrative.

So what is ‘dengue fever’?

Under the heading Symptoms, the fact sheet states,

“Most people with dengue have mild or no symptoms and will get better in 1–2 weeks. Rarely, dengue can be severe and lead to death.”

In other words, you could have dengue and not know it because you don’t have any symptoms.

At the risk of repeating myself, the medical establishment defines ‘diseases’ by the signs and symptoms presented by the patient. So, if no symptoms are present, how can a doctor diagnose a ‘disease’?

Claim number 1 has not been ‘proved’. And all the remaining claims depend on this first one!

Claim number 2. Climate change is responsible.

According to the article,

“Climate change is creating favourable conditions for the tiger mosquito to spread, said the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).”

Maybe the number of tiger mosquitoes has increased in Europe; how would we know though? Additionally, where is the proof that their proliferation is the result of ‘climate change’?

The simple answer is that there is none.

Nor is there any explanation of what the allegedly ‘favourable conditions’ actually are. Why have they not provided that explanation? I think the answer to that is pretty clear; the purpose of the BBC article is to foment fear, not answer questions.

Furthermore, the climate is a complex system that has never been proven to change as the result of increased atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide. It is widely known that carbon dioxide increases plant yields when used in greenhouses; so it cannot be ‘dangerous’.

Claim number 3. Insect repellant is beneficial.

To combat the ‘threat’, the BBC provides the following ‘advice’,

“It has advised people to remove stagnant water from gardens or balconies, where mosquitoes can breed, and use repellent and mosquito nets at night.”

Who keeps ‘stagnant water’ on their balconies?

Mosquito nets may be useful, but do make sure they haven’t been saturated in insect repellant. Some of the chemicals used as repellants have been shown to be irritants if not actually harmful. So even if they work to keep the mosquitoes away, they are detrimental to your health.

Claim number 4. Travel is a problem.

And here we can see the next layer of the agenda,

“The ECDC has warned international travel will further increase the risk of more European outbreaks.”

So what is the cause of the increased mosquito population? Is it ‘climate change’ or is it mosquito stowaways on airplanes?.

It seems they are trying to make the ‘movement of people and trade’ into a threatening problem,

“Most European cases are imported - a reflection of the international movement of people and trade, with imported cases soaring to nearly 5,000 last year.”

I would suggest that this represents an effort to make us feel guilty for travelling. But this also seems to be demonising ‘international trade’, which makes no sense because the ‘would-be controllers’ thrive on trade. Or is this just a smokescreen to make us think they care about the problems with trade? Is the real focus of this attack solely on demonising ‘international travel’?

Claim number 5. Malaria is a deadly disease.

And here comes the heavyweight threat - malaria,

“Malaria is the most deadly mosquito-borne disease on the planet. It spreads to people through the bites of infected female mosquitoes called anopheles, which have also been found in Europe.”

It sounds as if this claim has been proven, but that is not the case.

The article adds that,

“There are concerns incidents of malaria could also spike on the continent in the future, if conditions are right.”

To counter this claim, here’s an extract from What Really Makes You Ill?, which contains a substantial section on the topic of malaria that exposes the many problems with the mainstream claims.

I would add that Anopheles mosquitoes inhabit every continent with the sole exception of Antarctica AND that the Plasmodium parasites claimed to be transmitted by these mosquitoes are also ubiquitous on every continent, except for Antarctica.

Finding mosquitoes in Europe is therefore not the issue, nor is it a ‘problem’; Europe is one of their natural habitats!

The purpose of this article is, in my opinion, just another effort to ramp up the fear-mongering, especially with respect to subjects that remain unproven, and some that have even been disproven.

Sadly, this ‘story’ about tiger mosquitoes being found in Europe is also reported by so-called ‘alternative’ media sources, which is why we all have to keep our critical thinking hats on and remain discerning all the time.

I also found yet another similarly biased article about ‘ticks’ and the diseases they are claimed to cause on the BBC website. This one is called Tick attack: BBC hunts for tiny bloodsuckers as diseases rise.

The key message can be seen under the dramatic heading Dangerous diseases,

“If all ticks did was bite they would just be a nuisance. But like mosquitoes they spread disease when they plunge their mouths into our skin to drink blood.

The most well-known is Lyme disease.

About 4% of ticks carry the bacteria that cause the infection, which can trigger years of aches and fatigue.”

And this is yet another reason it is so important to dispel the ‘germ theory’ myth.

Bacteria are not ‘viruses’; they do exist and are important components of the ecosystem, both the external environment and also our internal environment.

Although ticks do draw blood and inject pretty nasty substances into people when they do so, they have not been proven to cause disease, as I discussed in this article,

The key point to note is that by understanding that ‘diseases’ are not caused by germs and transmitted by insects or arachnids, we no longer live in fear, but instead take responsibility and learn what we can do for ourselves to improve our health.

We are all unique individuals, so the solutions to our ‘health issues’, which are not ‘diseases’ in the first place, will be unique to each of us. And that is what the medical establishment system fails to understand, although this is probably deliberate because our uniqueness cannot be standardised and rolled out to apply to “everyone, everywhere”, which is the aim of the ‘Global Goals’ aka the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Note the reference to the surge in cases of malaria!

I would emphasise that ‘they’ cannot achieve their goals if we do not accept their stories.