Another flip-flop:

Sowing more seeds of confusion…

So, the narrative that ‘Covid’ was caused by a lab-created ‘virus’ has now been flipped again - but not to the truth that there never was a ‘virus’, sadly. Instead, it has been flopped back to the original ‘animal origin’ story that claims ‘the virus’ emerged from a Wuhan market.

I discovered this latest spin in a very recent BBC article entitled Covid’s market origins that begins,

“A team of scientists say it is “beyond reasonable doubt” the Covid pandemic started with infected animals sold at a market, rather than a laboratory leak.”

This claim is based on a study published last year, 2023, entitled Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 at the Huanan Seafood Market

The study begins with the statement that,

“Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019, emerged in December 2019.”

And this is where the problem with this story starts, because, as so many of us have been reporting for more than 4 years, there is no evidence, and there never has been, that a so-called ‘virus’ that became known as SARS-CoV-2 was the causative agent of so-called ‘Covid-19’.

And this is why the ‘no virus’ position is of such importance - because otherwise, ‘they’ can keep flip-flopping on the alleged origin of the ‘virus’ for as long as they want and keep people in a state of fear that there is a ‘virus’ that they can ‘catch’ and spread to others.

Although I’ve written about this many times, the reason for returning to it is because it seems that ‘they’ are changing the narrative to completely avoid the isolation issue and instead place all the emphasis on ‘genetics’.

The BBC article refers to the study and states,

“Their analysis was published last year and the raw data made available to other scientists. Now a team in the US and France says they have performed even more advanced genetic analyses to peer deeper into Covid’s early days.”

The article continues,

“It involved analysing millions of short fragments of genetic code – both DNA and RNA – to establish what animals and viruses were in the market in January 2020.”

The team from the US and France that is reported to have ‘performed even more advanced genetic analyses’, has published its results, on 19th September 2024, in a paper entitled Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic, the summary of which begins,

“Zoonotic spillovers of viruses have occurred through the animal trade worldwide. The start of the COVID-19 pandemic was traced epidemiologically to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.”

Zoonotic refers to a disease that is claimed to be transmitted between humans and animals, which presupposes that there is such a thing as an ‘infectious disease’ that is caused by a ‘pathogen’ of some description.

But there is zero evidence that any ‘disease’ is caused by a so-called ‘pathogen’. This means of course that there is also zero evidence for the notion of ‘zoonotic spillover’.

Nevertheless, the propaganda continues and, according to the BBC article, the new study,

“…shows Covid virus and susceptible animals were detected in the same location, with some individual swabs collecting both animal and coronavirus genetic code.”

And under the heading Reading the virus’s code, is the statement that,

“The research teams also analysed the genetic code of the viral samples found in the market, and compared them to samples from patients in the early days of the pandemic. Looking at the variety of different mutations in the viral samples also provides clues.”

I need to emphasise a point here that can not be stated often enough - in order to determine the genetic code of a ‘virus’, it is essential to have performed direct observation of that ‘virus’ alone, meaning separated from everything else (in other words, isolated), so that it can be studied. Only then could its genetic material be characterised and recorded as being ‘unique’ to that entity. If this process were followed, it would allow a genuine database to be created for the genetic codes of various ‘viruses’ that could be accessed for comparison with other ‘viruses’ to determine ‘mutations’ or ‘variants’.

The fact is, this has never happened.

No ‘virus’ has ever been isolated from the fluids of a sick person and its unique characteristics, including its genome, characterised. This means that absolutely no one knows the genome of any so-called ‘virus’.

This, in turn, means that any statements about finding the genetic code of various ‘viruses’ in animal markets are grossly misleading, which is putting it mildly.

So-called ‘viral genomes’ are assembled within computer programmes, they are not detected by any direct means.

I would also add that PCR, which is used as one of the main ‘tests’ for ‘Covid’, has been shown to be unable to detect the presence of viruses. But also, to test for something using PCR, it is essential to know what one is looking for in order to know what to match it against.

Because no one knows the ‘genetic code’ of any so-called ‘virus’, the PCR test is meaningless.

In his very thorough essay, A Farewell to Virology, Dr Mark Bailey refers to the topic of ‘viral genomes’ and calls it an illusion, he states,

“The virus genomes have become what is possibly the greatest illusion in virology, an illusion which propagates a belief that viruses are indeed being shown to exist. The virologists themselves don’t seem to appreciate the fatal flaw in their methodologies even when they state it themselves…”

He also states that,

“It should be clear at this point that each coronavirus genome has been templated against other so-called genomes without the virologists demonstrating that any of the sequences come from a virus.”

And if those statements aren’t sufficiently convincing, he summarises the situation succinctly in the statement that,

“…virology’s fictional genomic inventions have been relied upon to create wholly unnecessary medical and political interventions.”

And it looks like ‘they’, the ‘would-be controllers’ as I call them, are going to continue to rely on these ‘fictional inventions’ to create more division, not only within the general population, but also within the ‘truth community’ regarding the existence of the ‘virus’.

Although it seems to be heavily promoting the ‘animal origin’ story, the BBC article does seem to hedge its bets on the ‘lab leak’ story by not entirely dismissing it, as in the following comment,

So which narrative are we being asked to believe here?

As there’s always a point to these stories, it’s worthwhile to note that the BBC article ends with the following,

“Prof James Wood, the co-director of Cambridge Infectious Diseases, said the study provided “very strong evidence” of the pandemic starting in wildlife stalls at the market. However, he said it could not be definitive because the samples were collected after the market closed, and the pandemic probably started weeks earlier.

And he warned "little or nothing" was being done to limit the live trade in wildlife, and "uncontrolled transmission of animal infections poses a major risk of future pandemics."

So that’s the key takeaway message - it’s all about the potential for ‘animal infections’ and the ‘risk’ of future ‘pandemics’. Also, demonising animals plays into the aspect of the agenda that seeks to make us fear nature and not want to live with animals, which, according to their ideology, will make people more willing to move into ‘smart’ cities.

Yet again, this is clearly all about fear.

Therefore, knowing there is no such thing as a ‘pathogenic virus’ that can be transmitted between people - or between animals and people - eliminates ‘their’ ability to scare people and invoke all kinds of measures in the name of ‘protecting us’.

If you wish to dive deeper into the topic, I highly recommend reading the entire paper, A Farewell to Virology

For further reading on the topic of ‘viral genomes’, I recommend Mike Stone’s excellent article,

A Friendly Chat About "Viral" Genomes