It's barbaric and did you know that before the mid 80s doctors didn't use anesthesia when doing surgeries like circumcision on babies?
Somehow they thought that babies didn't have nerves fully developed.
But that's not an excuse as the baby cries and screams... What the fk did they think? Instead they just continued?!
Sociopathic! But then, humanity is full of crazy shit like that in the past.
My theory is that in the past, humans had limited awareness.
Remember the films of men working on skyscrapers, walking on I beams without protection? One gust of wind knocks them down. But somehow they didn't perceive the threat.
Same thing with animals. Back in the day, scientists thought animals didn't feel pain or were mere automatons when they performed horrific experiments on them. Knowing that animals are indeed sentient beings still doesn't matter as they will still not use anesthesia during some animal research procedures. Allopathic medicine- which compartmentalizes the body- will marginalize or dismiss the suffering of others and are cavalier about removing healthy body parts from a healthy body, claiming it is for "prevention". It is barbaric!
As of 1996, less than 25% of American circumcisions were done with anesthesia. The rate continues to be incredibly low. If done at all, it is usually just topical, and unlikely to fully control the pain - and despite the long painful recovery - infants are never sent home with pain management.
For parents who choose an elective newborn circumcision, administration of vitamin K injection (at least in the USA) is required before the procedure. Vitamin K is part of this macabre genital mutilation ritual. I quote: "The risk of bleeding during circumcision has significantly decreased since vitamin K supplementation became the standard of care in the U.S". The doctor is thus protected from liability by following this procedure. It turns out that the risk of autism is slightly higher after the vitamin K jab. Was autism imparted by the intense pain & trauma or from the aluminum reaching the brain or the other poisons in this jab? Or all of the above?
Synthetic Vitamin K is formulated for injection with many poisons: ALUMINUM adjuvant, benzyl alcohol, hydrochloric acid, polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, sodium acetate anhydrous, and vinegar. No surprise that kids are sicker with this injection, including chronic neurological damage and chronic problems from permanent genital mutilation.
I would circumvent this satanic ritual. Thanks Dawn!
Thank you, Dawn! As a student and practicer of drawing and sculpting from an early age, I used to study the works of the "masters". Not being raised Jewish, when I grew to an age where I actually had the opportunity to explore the physical facts of (American) males I was surprised! Why the difference between, say, Michelangelo's "David" and my lover, or a life drawing model? What brainwashing! What utter brutality!
It is. I had no idea until recently how prevalent it was in the US as a non-religious procedure - and pushed as if it were protective against 'infectious diseases', which it isn't because they don't exist.
The brainwashing is incredible, but that's another reason to help inform people about it.
It is. I had no idea until recently how prevalent it was in the US as a non-religious procedure - and pushed as if it were protective against 'infectious diseases', which it isn't because they don't exist.
The brainwashing is incredible, but that's another reason to help inform people about it.
Jews and their practices came about by avoiding being chosen for active duty in flying machines, 20k of nerve endings on the end of a penis skin, (don’t quote me on exact numbers).
I always like your writings Dawn and agree with your main points and the majority of what you say. However, I think that not wanting to write about the religious aspect of circumcision is somewhat ironic for a practice that is entirely religious at its origins. Furthermore, making the practice illegal would infringe on religious freedom. While the existence of illness causing viruses and pathogens in general has not been demonstrated, and so this rationale is therefore suspect--ridiculous for those who know--I don't see that the proported harms you are claiming are at all comparable to female genital mutilation, to the extent that to claim this seems disingenuous or at the very least problematic. Finally, there are cases where circumcision is medically necessary, unlike something such as, say, vaccination which should be classified as definitively harmful to the general health of the population and immediately banned in all forms for humans and animals.
Otherwise, I of course agree with your points about the lunacy of using those stated health reasons to encourage the practice of circumcision. On the contrary, I think the practice needs to be seen as the religious practice that it is.
Sorry for bringing up the part you didn't want to discuss!! But if you want to be knowledgeable about it you can't avoid it.
I wasn't avoiding the religious aspect entirely. I chose not to discuss that aspect in this article, although I may do so in later articles. As I said, it's a topic that I plan to write more about, because there are many aspects and nuances to it.
I think if it was made illegal, there would be religious exemptions.
Point taken. I just wonder why parents feel compelled to impose their religion way before the child has had a chance to decide for themselves. I suppose it's because religions tend to be coercive in many aspects. My parents left the religious decision up to me then sent me to a C of E church school who attempted to indoctrinate for many years without success. (I sang in the choir, rang the bells, played the organ and enjoyed it but never fell for the supernatural aspects). I remain happily and healthily unscathed by ritualistic barbarism.
It seems according to Roger Dommergue Polaco de Menasce that this intervention when taking place at a very early age of a child (between the day 8 and 21 of his birth) can have long lasting consequences on the pineal gland that manifest through lack of psychological or moral balance and immoderate behaviors. His thesis is worth visiting and seem supported by facts we witness on a daily basis.
It's barbaric and did you know that before the mid 80s doctors didn't use anesthesia when doing surgeries like circumcision on babies?
Somehow they thought that babies didn't have nerves fully developed.
But that's not an excuse as the baby cries and screams... What the fk did they think? Instead they just continued?!
Sociopathic! But then, humanity is full of crazy shit like that in the past.
My theory is that in the past, humans had limited awareness.
Remember the films of men working on skyscrapers, walking on I beams without protection? One gust of wind knocks them down. But somehow they didn't perceive the threat.
It's like they thought that only dummies fall?
Same thing with animals. Back in the day, scientists thought animals didn't feel pain or were mere automatons when they performed horrific experiments on them. Knowing that animals are indeed sentient beings still doesn't matter as they will still not use anesthesia during some animal research procedures. Allopathic medicine- which compartmentalizes the body- will marginalize or dismiss the suffering of others and are cavalier about removing healthy body parts from a healthy body, claiming it is for "prevention". It is barbaric!
"Remember the films of men working on skyscrapers, walking on I beams without protection?"
That still happens. Sure, regulation exists and protections available, but I watch guys ignore stuff like that all the time on the job site.
As of 1996, less than 25% of American circumcisions were done with anesthesia. The rate continues to be incredibly low. If done at all, it is usually just topical, and unlikely to fully control the pain - and despite the long painful recovery - infants are never sent home with pain management.
For parents who choose an elective newborn circumcision, administration of vitamin K injection (at least in the USA) is required before the procedure. Vitamin K is part of this macabre genital mutilation ritual. I quote: "The risk of bleeding during circumcision has significantly decreased since vitamin K supplementation became the standard of care in the U.S". The doctor is thus protected from liability by following this procedure. It turns out that the risk of autism is slightly higher after the vitamin K jab. Was autism imparted by the intense pain & trauma or from the aluminum reaching the brain or the other poisons in this jab? Or all of the above?
Synthetic Vitamin K is formulated for injection with many poisons: ALUMINUM adjuvant, benzyl alcohol, hydrochloric acid, polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, sodium acetate anhydrous, and vinegar. No surprise that kids are sicker with this injection, including chronic neurological damage and chronic problems from permanent genital mutilation.
I would circumvent this satanic ritual. Thanks Dawn!
Thank you for sharing that information about the Vitamin K shot.
More from Doctor Sam! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjJGBxUKozk
Also Joy Garner included the vitamin K shot in her study of a US non-vaccinated cohort.
"Health versus Disorder, Disease, and Death: Unvaccinated Persons Are Incommensurably Healthier than Vaccinated"
By Joy Garner, Founder of the Control Group, https://www.thecontrolgroup.org/
Thank you for the links. 🙏
I've found the Joy Garner article,
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/40/375
It's an honour. Just doing my bit.
It is worthy of reiteration: "... it can clearly be stated that circumcision lowers the risk of infection..."
"Clearly stated" SUGGESTS there is evidence without there being any. Tricky bs artists casting their spells!
True, and notice that they only refer to 'risk' of infection, not actual infection - not that there is such a thing as 'infection'.
Thank you, Dawn! As a student and practicer of drawing and sculpting from an early age, I used to study the works of the "masters". Not being raised Jewish, when I grew to an age where I actually had the opportunity to explore the physical facts of (American) males I was surprised! Why the difference between, say, Michelangelo's "David" and my lover, or a life drawing model? What brainwashing! What utter brutality!
It is. I had no idea until recently how prevalent it was in the US as a non-religious procedure - and pushed as if it were protective against 'infectious diseases', which it isn't because they don't exist.
The brainwashing is incredible, but that's another reason to help inform people about it.
Thank you for all you do to raise awareness about this and so many areas of concern. And they all seem to be connected!
It is. I had no idea until recently how prevalent it was in the US as a non-religious procedure - and pushed as if it were protective against 'infectious diseases', which it isn't because they don't exist.
The brainwashing is incredible, but that's another reason to help inform people about it.
Unnecessary genital mutilation, pure and simple.
THANK YOU.
Humanity is capable of the most foolish if not depraved behaviors, circumcision being one of them.......
Jews and their practices came about by avoiding being chosen for active duty in flying machines, 20k of nerve endings on the end of a penis skin, (don’t quote me on exact numbers).
I always like your writings Dawn and agree with your main points and the majority of what you say. However, I think that not wanting to write about the religious aspect of circumcision is somewhat ironic for a practice that is entirely religious at its origins. Furthermore, making the practice illegal would infringe on religious freedom. While the existence of illness causing viruses and pathogens in general has not been demonstrated, and so this rationale is therefore suspect--ridiculous for those who know--I don't see that the proported harms you are claiming are at all comparable to female genital mutilation, to the extent that to claim this seems disingenuous or at the very least problematic. Finally, there are cases where circumcision is medically necessary, unlike something such as, say, vaccination which should be classified as definitively harmful to the general health of the population and immediately banned in all forms for humans and animals.
Otherwise, I of course agree with your points about the lunacy of using those stated health reasons to encourage the practice of circumcision. On the contrary, I think the practice needs to be seen as the religious practice that it is.
Sorry for bringing up the part you didn't want to discuss!! But if you want to be knowledgeable about it you can't avoid it.
I wasn't avoiding the religious aspect entirely. I chose not to discuss that aspect in this article, although I may do so in later articles. As I said, it's a topic that I plan to write more about, because there are many aspects and nuances to it.
I think if it was made illegal, there would be religious exemptions.
Point taken. I just wonder why parents feel compelled to impose their religion way before the child has had a chance to decide for themselves. I suppose it's because religions tend to be coercive in many aspects. My parents left the religious decision up to me then sent me to a C of E church school who attempted to indoctrinate for many years without success. (I sang in the choir, rang the bells, played the organ and enjoyed it but never fell for the supernatural aspects). I remain happily and healthily unscathed by ritualistic barbarism.
I agree that religions are coercive. I'm glad you were able to actually choose for yourself.
It seems according to Roger Dommergue Polaco de Menasce that this intervention when taking place at a very early age of a child (between the day 8 and 21 of his birth) can have long lasting consequences on the pineal gland that manifest through lack of psychological or moral balance and immoderate behaviors. His thesis is worth visiting and seem supported by facts we witness on a daily basis.
I've not heard of him. I'll look into hs work.