In parts 1 and 2 of this series, I discussed the complete lack of evidence for the existence of ‘pathogenic agents’ of any description and the efforts of the medical establishment to promote vaccines as the only way to prevent what are erroneously referred to as ‘infectious diseases’.
Very good analysis Dawn. Not a thing I can disagree with. The Banksters and their control of Corporations creating a corporatist view of how life should be conducted is just a case of power-mongering and profiteering by the desired attempt to monopolise all the markets of the world. Their claim the world can not feed itself, nutritionally, is utter balderdash. We Know it is all a lame excuse under the cover of "goodness" to control every individual possible.
The financial bottleneck of economies should be the first stop to creating a prosperous world for everyone. The bankster system must be destroyed and replaced with a system that serves rather than masters the people. The creation and application of money to an economy must be returned to it's natural purpose--to facilitate trade and access to production by the consumers ie. the public. Whatever is physically possible must be made financially possible without penalty.
So it may interest you and some of your readers to entertain themselves of this brilliant book (a proponent of Social Credit) called "A Matter of LIFE or DEBT":
"Dedicated to all individuals who desire to live in Freedom, Abundance, and Leisure without DEBT.
We have the technology to feed, house, and clothe all people on planet Earth. The only obstacle in its way is the bankers' monopolized interest-bearing bank money, generally referred to as Bank Credit. Humane World Community, Inc.
We do discuss the problems in some detail in our book, but it's a topic that people have written whole books about.
Why are you recommending that book if it is a proponent of social credit? Surely that's one of the main ways that the 'would-be-controllers' are trying to establish their ability to control everyone's lives completely?
Yes, we can all live in Freedom, Abundance and Leisure - when we take responsibility for our own lives.
I think you are confusing Major Douglas's Social Credit economic philosophy with Chinese Social Credit. It is not Socialism as you might think, but its very opposite.
Major Douglas's Social Credit has nothing to do with that idea and was always opposed by Communists/Socialists. Hopefully, once you read the book, you will understand that it is a finance-economic philosophy opposed to the 'would-be-controllers' setting the individual free from their control, which at its very foundation is the control of the monetary system globally in the hands of the the bankster-gangsters.
I know there is a deeper cause than any belief in a virus as being something real, but I'd be very interested to hear what you think is the answer.
I agree that nothing can be 'off the table' when we start to seek 'truth', but some people seem to stop at the first or maybe even the second layer and think they've found it, but that's not the case.
For the most part, the people I know who are in 'team no virus' (for want of a better term) are all looking very much deeper into the problems we face and their causes. But they are also looking deeper into the real nature of who we are.
For me, that is the most important 'work' we can be doing right now, because it is the only way that we can make the changes we want to see.
Very good analysis Dawn. Not a thing I can disagree with. The Banksters and their control of Corporations creating a corporatist view of how life should be conducted is just a case of power-mongering and profiteering by the desired attempt to monopolise all the markets of the world. Their claim the world can not feed itself, nutritionally, is utter balderdash. We Know it is all a lame excuse under the cover of "goodness" to control every individual possible.
The financial bottleneck of economies should be the first stop to creating a prosperous world for everyone. The bankster system must be destroyed and replaced with a system that serves rather than masters the people. The creation and application of money to an economy must be returned to it's natural purpose--to facilitate trade and access to production by the consumers ie. the public. Whatever is physically possible must be made financially possible without penalty.
So it may interest you and some of your readers to entertain themselves of this brilliant book (a proponent of Social Credit) called "A Matter of LIFE or DEBT":
"Dedicated to all individuals who desire to live in Freedom, Abundance, and Leisure without DEBT.
We have the technology to feed, house, and clothe all people on planet Earth. The only obstacle in its way is the bankers' monopolized interest-bearing bank money, generally referred to as Bank Credit. Humane World Community, Inc.
https://pdfcoffee.com/a-matter-of-life-or-debt-by-eric-de-mare-brilliant-book-on-social-credit-pdf-free.html
Thank you for your comments, Rene.
We do discuss the problems in some detail in our book, but it's a topic that people have written whole books about.
Why are you recommending that book if it is a proponent of social credit? Surely that's one of the main ways that the 'would-be-controllers' are trying to establish their ability to control everyone's lives completely?
Yes, we can all live in Freedom, Abundance and Leisure - when we take responsibility for our own lives.
I think you are confusing Major Douglas's Social Credit economic philosophy with Chinese Social Credit. It is not Socialism as you might think, but its very opposite.
This article explains the difference between the idea of a "basic income" of the WEF/Chinese Social Credit idea, which terminology I believe they deliberately stole: https://www.socred.org/s-c-action/social-credit-views/social-credit-vs-a-basic-income/the-big-difference-between-a-basic-income-and-the-national-dividend
Major Douglas's Social Credit has nothing to do with that idea and was always opposed by Communists/Socialists. Hopefully, once you read the book, you will understand that it is a finance-economic philosophy opposed to the 'would-be-controllers' setting the individual free from their control, which at its very foundation is the control of the monetary system globally in the hands of the the bankster-gangsters.
Yes, I obviously did misunderstand. I will read that article and the book when I can. Thank you.
Another great article Dawn. I shared it as I can
Thank you. :)
I know there is a deeper cause than any belief in a virus as being something real, but I'd be very interested to hear what you think is the answer.
I agree that nothing can be 'off the table' when we start to seek 'truth', but some people seem to stop at the first or maybe even the second layer and think they've found it, but that's not the case.
For the most part, the people I know who are in 'team no virus' (for want of a better term) are all looking very much deeper into the problems we face and their causes. But they are also looking deeper into the real nature of who we are.
For me, that is the most important 'work' we can be doing right now, because it is the only way that we can make the changes we want to see.
Thank you very much. :)
Yes, it definitely is time to reject all pseudoscience.