The Merriam-Webster web page that contains the definition of ‘pandemic’ includes a section called Frequently Asked Questions that also provides answers. One such question and answer is,
the world Council for health the baby of the so called health freedom movement is annoying me more and more, leading lights Bossche and Malone.
from their website The virus that causes Covid-19 was first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In early 2020, the mainstream scientific consensus was that the novel virus, named SARS-CoV-2, originated from a mutation of a beta-coronavirus naturally circulating in bats. At the same time, emerging evidence suggesting that the novel coronavirus may have entered human populations as a result of a lab leak were dismissed.
Almost two years on, the lab-leak hypothesis has been gaining momentum, with suggestions that the virus may have been the product of gain-of-function research and it was accidentally or deliberately released. This evidence includes the lack of an identified intermediate animal host, genetic signatures typical of genetic engineering rather than natural selection, and leaked documents that reveal international collaboration in gain-of-function research in China.!!!
Thank you. I'll have a look at those links when I can.
I did quickly look at your 'I'm just testing something' article and I do know and am in contact with a number of people whose work you cite, such as Christine Massey, Mike Donio and Sam Bailey for example.
If you don't know about my work, you might like to look at our website,
What kind of 'experts' do you confront? And what means do you use to convey the message other than your Substack articles? Do you have any success in your efforts to get them to listen to your message?
Hi Dawn,
the world Council for health the baby of the so called health freedom movement is annoying me more and more, leading lights Bossche and Malone.
from their website The virus that causes Covid-19 was first reported in Wuhan, China in December 2019. In early 2020, the mainstream scientific consensus was that the novel virus, named SARS-CoV-2, originated from a mutation of a beta-coronavirus naturally circulating in bats. At the same time, emerging evidence suggesting that the novel coronavirus may have entered human populations as a result of a lab leak were dismissed.
Almost two years on, the lab-leak hypothesis has been gaining momentum, with suggestions that the virus may have been the product of gain-of-function research and it was accidentally or deliberately released. This evidence includes the lack of an identified intermediate animal host, genetic signatures typical of genetic engineering rather than natural selection, and leaked documents that reveal international collaboration in gain-of-function research in China.!!!
This screams controlled opposition to me.
Would you write something about them?
Jo
Thank you Jo,
I have written something about this. It was in my COVID: The Plot Thickens article.
https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/covid-the-plot-thickens
Thank you Dawn
Jo
Yes, I know Tracey, she's a good friend of mine.
She's active on a site called 'Blurt' (search "Blurt Northern Tracey")
Thank you. I'll have a look at those links when I can.
I did quickly look at your 'I'm just testing something' article and I do know and am in contact with a number of people whose work you cite, such as Christine Massey, Mike Donio and Sam Bailey for example.
If you don't know about my work, you might like to look at our website,
https://whatreallymakesyouill.com/
OK, thank you.
What kind of 'experts' do you confront? And what means do you use to convey the message other than your Substack articles? Do you have any success in your efforts to get them to listen to your message?