Just a thought. You might want to include some "subscribe" and "share" options in your posts. These are available in your editor and you can also customize them. Substack definitely recommends this. You can also link to other articles, your own or others', by simply placing the Substack link in your draft. Also, including the link to your Substack brings up a very nice-looking subscribe option. It took me a little while to get the hang of the editor, and I'm still learning, but I thought I'd help streamline your process because your work is important and needs to reach a larger audience ASAP.
Dawn. In the time since the Sars-CoV-2 panic hit us I have become aware that there are some that question whether contagious virus cause and spread disease. But this is the first time I read an article about it.
Your explanation for why many seem to get the same disease is that they have been exposed to the same or similar circumstances, but not a virus?
I find this very interesting. My trust in medical authorities (and other authorities) have dropped close to the floor since the advent of Sars-CoV-2.
But what about bacteria? That’s quite different from virus, isn’t it? What about the most dreaded disease of tuberculosis? What causes it (a bacteria I thought), and how can it be healed and/or prevented?
Antibiotics are toxic. And no, they don't 'cure' anything. They may appear to stop symptoms but that is not the same thing as restoring the body to health. The fact that they are toxic only adds to the body's burden of toxins that will need to be expelled at some later stage - through a variety of 'symptoms'.
Stories about flesh-eating bacteria are just that - stories! The point is that there is no evidence that bacteria are the cause of any symptoms, whatever they are called.
There are reasons that the body produces 'symptoms', but they have nothing to do with any 'infection'. Bacteria are decomposers, they are essential helpers in the body's processes for eliminating toxic substances and restoring health.
Hello, new to your substack, as well as terrain theory... I've learned just enough thus far to be skeptical. I have a simple question I hope you'll answer, since it will help me understand your theory that viruses either don't exist or don't cause disease:
What causes rabies? If not the rabies virus, what is transmitted from the saliva of a rabid animal to a bitten human that results in a death sentence w/o immediate treatment?
First of all, it is not my 'theory'. I am merely pointing out that the 'germ theory' remains unproven and that there is no evidence that any particle that has been called a 'virus' has ever been proven to cause a disease.
There are many problems with rabies. It is claimed to be cause by a 'virus', but that has never been proven. Also, there is no evidence that anything IS transmitted from a 'rabid' dog. There is plenty of evidence that the treatment itself is harmful.
Just a thought. You might want to include some "subscribe" and "share" options in your posts. These are available in your editor and you can also customize them. Substack definitely recommends this. You can also link to other articles, your own or others', by simply placing the Substack link in your draft. Also, including the link to your Substack brings up a very nice-looking subscribe option. It took me a little while to get the hang of the editor, and I'm still learning, but I thought I'd help streamline your process because your work is important and needs to reach a larger audience ASAP.
Thank you Sol. I'll look into that. Much appreciated.
🙏
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes.
Dawn. In the time since the Sars-CoV-2 panic hit us I have become aware that there are some that question whether contagious virus cause and spread disease. But this is the first time I read an article about it.
Your explanation for why many seem to get the same disease is that they have been exposed to the same or similar circumstances, but not a virus?
I find this very interesting. My trust in medical authorities (and other authorities) have dropped close to the floor since the advent of Sars-CoV-2.
But what about bacteria? That’s quite different from virus, isn’t it? What about the most dreaded disease of tuberculosis? What causes it (a bacteria I thought), and how can it be healed and/or prevented?
Bacteria are definitely different from viruses. For one thing they have been proven to exist.
But they do not cause disease either - this has never been proven. So no, TB is not caused by any bacterium.
Here's an article I wrote about Strep A, which is supposed to be bacterial,
https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/a-new-bacterial-disease-no-its-just
If bacteria do not cause disease, what is antibiotics? They seem to cure many ailments/diseases, don’t they?
One hears about people being attacked by vicious flesh eating bacteria. Sometimes these bacteria are stopped (how?), sometimes not it seems like.
Antibiotics are toxic. And no, they don't 'cure' anything. They may appear to stop symptoms but that is not the same thing as restoring the body to health. The fact that they are toxic only adds to the body's burden of toxins that will need to be expelled at some later stage - through a variety of 'symptoms'.
Stories about flesh-eating bacteria are just that - stories! The point is that there is no evidence that bacteria are the cause of any symptoms, whatever they are called.
There are reasons that the body produces 'symptoms', but they have nothing to do with any 'infection'. Bacteria are decomposers, they are essential helpers in the body's processes for eliminating toxic substances and restoring health.
Hello, new to your substack, as well as terrain theory... I've learned just enough thus far to be skeptical. I have a simple question I hope you'll answer, since it will help me understand your theory that viruses either don't exist or don't cause disease:
What causes rabies? If not the rabies virus, what is transmitted from the saliva of a rabid animal to a bitten human that results in a death sentence w/o immediate treatment?
Also, I would suggest that you read this article, which shows that a bite from a dog claimed to be 'rabid' does not result in a death sentence,
http://whale.to/vaccine/rabies.html
First of all, it is not my 'theory'. I am merely pointing out that the 'germ theory' remains unproven and that there is no evidence that any particle that has been called a 'virus' has ever been proven to cause a disease.
There are many problems with rabies. It is claimed to be cause by a 'virus', but that has never been proven. Also, there is no evidence that anything IS transmitted from a 'rabid' dog. There is plenty of evidence that the treatment itself is harmful.
yes https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/how-does-transmission-of-illness