24 Comments
Mar 3, 2023·edited Mar 3, 2023Liked by Dawn Lester

Yes the false narrative is full of contradictions all the time. People choosing fear do not even seem to notice as they are not awake .

. The media narrative is one of keeping people in fear and ignorance as you well know.

Before the convid19 psyop it was said that the rna (that was computer generated into an imaginary string =to be called a "virus") " corona" was routinely found up the nose of healthy people. But even what they had once said was utterly reversed .

Like what they told people about "antibodies" when they dont even know what having them means 1) you were previously "infected" and are now immune or 2) you are "infected" . But they say this utterly contradictory statement when having antibodies provides no proof of being " infected" with anything whatsoever. There are no "covid" antibodies.

People believing this media spread nonsense and killing birds is another example of how people in the grip of fear are totally insane. Fear makes for wrong action, it how problems are made.

Fear -submission- control.

Expand full comment

Yes. total confusion about antibodies which when they're against "HIV" it means you are ill and not immune at all!

There are no covid antibodies because there is no covid- but there are specific sticky proteins we are calling antibodies, though they are not anti https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/if-viruses-dont-exist-what-about

🙏🏽

Expand full comment

Could it be that when mucus gets really thick and sticky near or during an"illness" that it is because of more than usual of these sticky proteins present?

Expand full comment
Mar 3, 2023·edited Mar 3, 2023Liked by Dawn Lester

Great article, Dawn, and very clear as in all your talks! Regarding your question:

Are they suggesting that ‘norovirus’ is connected to ‘climate change’?

My personal opinion is that every opportunity they have to connect anything with "climate change " they will. 

As we know, there is no such thing as climate change. In this talk from 2015, Ivar Giaever explained the situation in detail:

https://odysee.com/@Gamzuletova:9/ClimateChange:3f?r=6iiBenUKRzEojrCq8v7SjZv66fdKomEG

What we do have is geoengineering. And maybe "climate change" , "climate warming", or whatever they will call it is just a coverup for the effects of geoengineering and chemtrails, but they will present the cause as the solution, as with vaccines, the other way around...

Expand full comment
author

Thank you. I agree that they are starting to associate everything with 'climate change' - my question was meant to encourage people who aren't aware that the 'climate change' narrative is false to start thinking about it.

Expand full comment
author

I have just watched that video. Very useful, thank you.

Expand full comment

Thanks to you Dawn !

Expand full comment

I think that the counter narrative- that we don't need to worry about burning billions of tonnes of oil and rock from under the earth or farming billions and billions of animals for food because these things don't affect the environment in anyway- is all coming from industry

Expand full comment
author

I agree that these issues are not simply a matter of choosing between 2 alternatives, which is how all these problems are always presented to us.

There is a very real difference between environmental problems and so-called 'climate change'. And it is obvious that making climate change the focus of attention stops people from looking at environmental problems from the correct perspective.

We cover this in detail in our book.

Expand full comment

Regarding birds... I understand the pattern of creating a crisis out of nothing (problem - reaction - solution), but in this case there's enough evidence of a genuine emergency. But it's microwaves not 'viruses'. An effective way to cover up a real health crisis is with a fake health crisis.

Birds are now routinely dropping out of the skies (all over the industrialised world) by the hundreds, thousands or even millions. It's so prevalent the media is forced to report on this and they often suggest 'bird flu' is the cause. But even if 'viruses' were real the 'flu' explanation would still make no sense because birds coming down with the flu would not drop dead out of the sky in mid flight! They would land and spend a few days on the ground or up a tree. If they didn't get better again they would eventually starve to death or get eaten by a fox (too weak to fly off).

Note how Channel Four tries to normalise / trivialise the issue. It's newsworthy, but also perfectly normal .... it's the new normal. And if you show any concern for this ecological catastrophe, well, that makes you a 'conspiracy theorist' or a Bible bashing ignoramus (these are actually veiled threats of social ostracism). They note that the birds died of 'shock' but the 'science correspondent' won't consider electromagnetic shock which is the most plausible explanation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed8DBXMKayk

In this report they suggest bird flu is causing vultures to drop out of the sky in mid flight. They admit the vultures are only dropping within sight of a water tower. They fail to mention there's a bloody great big cell tower right next to the water tower. They accidentally included a shot of it in the final edit. It's at 1min 14secs. Blink and you miss it. The newish looking electrical sheds at the bottom of the old tower suggest a recent upgrade.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKrZYGJYOKM

I'm all for reducing the fear mongering. And there is much fear mongering (and unhelpful speculation) around wireless tech which makes it hard to navigate the subject. That's why I like to stick to the basics (cell tower + bird = dead bird) and let people know how happy and content it makes me feel to not be a wireless gadget addict who is destroying our precious natural world :)

I think keeping the moral high ground is the way to win this. Even virtue signalling is a powerful tool we should not be afraid to use.

Expand full comment
author

I agree that cell towers are likely to be a significant contributory factor, but I hesitate to attribute these kinds of problems to only one causal factor, unless there is sufficient evidence that there is a direct and provable causal relationship.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your 'falling out of the sky' analysis. You've totally exposed for me the fraudulent suggestion it's a virus!!!

Expand full comment
Mar 3, 2023Liked by Dawn Lester

Thank you Dawn, for this wonderful dissertation on several 'Diseases' and your sane 'facts not fiction' approach.

I would add to the Syphilis section that it's original name in the medical historical literature was "The Great Pretender" and was almost always enlisted as the 'Diagnosis' for any groups of 'symptoms' for which the Doctors could not fathom a cause. It was their rug to brush under their lack of knowledge.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you very much for your kind words. 🙏

Yes, I am aware of the original name for syphilis and that diagnosis was based on a meaningless test - now where have we heard that before I wonder!!

I was trying in this article to focus on the possible reasons for the increased attention at the moment!

Expand full comment
Mar 3, 2023Liked by Dawn Lester

Dawn,

Yes I see and Love the timing of this latest Email.

Regarding the Marburg psy-op waiting in the wings;

I have had this on my hard drive since last year. I tell my friends to refer to Table 3 as I find it comical reading.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21505594.2022.2054760

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for sharing that paper.

Expand full comment

Thank you for continuing to add common sense and clarity to the incessant barrage of ridiculous propaganda.

Expand full comment
Mar 3, 2023Liked by Dawn Lester

Another fantastic reminder! I will share this, as well as a link to your fine book.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Greg. 😊

Expand full comment

The same things that are making people sick are making the earth sick as well="climate change". Earth changes would be a better description.

Expand full comment

I don't think this is about stopping people eating dead chickens and their eggs, though I'm hoping the attention of farming animals for food will have that effect, it's about making more money from the tax payer and consumer by the giants behind the narrative- the animal ag and pharma industries https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/increasing-the-price-and-demand-for

x

Expand full comment
author

I think there are many layers to this story and stopping peole raise their own chickens is one aspect. Although I agree it may not be one of the most important from the perspective of the 'would-be controllers' it is an important issue for people who are trying to be self-sufficient and not rely on Big Ag at all for their food.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

Thank you so much Jim for your kind words and your support. 🙏

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

But the medical establishment doesn't understand what causes heart disease either.

Expand full comment