Mpox: It’s not just about money!

There’s a meme spreading through social media that the key to the latest scare stories about monkeypox - now called ‘mpox’ - is just about removing the ‘k’ and knowing it’s all about the money!!

I’m not denying that money may well be one component, but I don’t believe it is the only one we need to consider in order to understand what’s going on.

So let’s dive in to some of the ‘stories’ taken, as usual, from articles on the BBC website, unless otherwise stated, to find what else is behind it all.

1. Mpox declared public health emergency in Africa

This first article acknowledges the name change and begins with the ominous statement that,

“Mpox, the high infectious disease that used to be called monkeypox, has been declared a public health emergency in Africa by the continent’s top health body.”

The article also refers to,

“The virus, which can cause lesions across the whole body….”

The assertions that 1) this is an ‘infectious disease’ and 2) ‘the virus’ causes lesions, have no scientific basis to support them, as I have discussed in many of my previous articles, as well as in What Really Makes You Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong (WRMYI)

The ‘top health body’ is effectively the African CDC, which is a key part of the ‘mainstream medical establishment’ and inevitably determined therefore to maintain the validity of ‘the germ theory’. And the medical establishment will continue to propagate this unproven theory until sufficient numbers of people stop believing it to be true. We’re moving in that direction, but not quite there - yet!

It is to assist this process that I continue to write these articles that expose the lack of evidence for ‘pathogenic germs’ of any description, not just ‘viruses’; to help more people understand that there is no validity whatsoever to the ‘germ theory’.

However, there is a comment in the article that deserves far more attention than it is probably receiving,

“The declaration of a public health emergency will help governments co-ordinate their response and potentially increase the flow of medical supplies and aid into affected areas.”

To explain what I mean, here’s an extract from WRMYI

The key section to emphasise is,

“EIS officers comprise some of the key personnel that travel to the location of a disease ‘outbreak’, whether in the US or elsewhere in the world. Their function is to carry out the necessary investigation to identify the cause of the disease and to implement the appropriate solutions to contain the problem.”

This may sound benign and even altruistic, but it permits interventions by the EIS officers of the US in other countries with the specific aim of imposing the Western model of ‘healthcare’, which has been shown to be seriously if not fatally flawed, especially with respect to what are claimed to be ‘infectious diseases’.

Is it possible that there could be a different agenda for these ‘interventions’ in addition to the stated aim?

I’d suggest the answer is yes and that we need to also contemplate the possibility that other ‘operatives’ are also involved and that these may be some of the other personnel who travel with EIS officers to African countries, but have a rather different purpose for their presence than helping to identify the cause of any health ‘problem’. They could be seeking opportunities to gain greater control in those regions of the world in various ways, such as through land grabs for example.

Land grabs are by no means a new phenomenon! But they may serve a different function now than they have previously served.

The usual justification for ‘land-grabs’ is that they are necessary to help solve the world’s food production problems. But the 2008 global economic crisis resulted in large scale purchases of farmland, particularly in ‘developing’ countries, as discussed in a November 2010 article entitled The new farm owners: Corporate investors lead the rush for control over overseas farmland, which states that

“For the past two years, investors have been scrambling to take control of farmland in Asia, Africa and Latin America.”

Investors are not farmers!

Farmers utilise land for the production of food, which will help people who are hungry. By contrast, investors hold land merely as an ‘investment’, often leaving it entirely unused. This will not help to ‘feed the world’.

I would point out that goal 2 of the 2030 Agenda is ‘Zero Hunger’. The aim of target 3 of SDG2 can be seen below.

The ‘scramble’ for farmland by corporate investors directly contradicts the aim of SDG 2.3; yet UN Member States have failed to recognise this contradiction, even though the problem of ‘world hunger’ is recognised to have worsened. The reason for this failure is because the ‘leaders’ of all countries that have signed up to the UN agreements have been coerced to comply. Dissenting voices are not allowed in the UN!!

Land grabs are not the only ‘reasons’ for interventions, but control of land does permit control of resources of all kinds and Africa is rich in resources, especially mineral resources that are vital for technology; more on this shortly.

2. What is mpox and how is it spread?

This story is an attempt to make people believe there is a new and more deadly ‘strain’ of this alleged disease,

“The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says it is more worrying than previous outbreaks because it involves a dangerous new variant of the disease.”

This is an attempt to reinforce the idea that viruses can have ‘variants’. But this too is unproven; there can be no ‘variants’ of something that has not been proven to exist in the first place.

Again, this is why the ‘no virus’ position is so important - and also, why it is resisted so strongly!

The article also claims that,

“The virus was originally transmitted from animals to humans but now also passes between humans.”

The purpose of this comment is to not only make us afraid of animals but to also keep us afraid of each other, now that we have returned to being sociable and gathering in groups.

Are they trying to prepare us for more lockdowns?

Interestingly, the so-called ‘monkeypox virus’ is claimed to be,

“… from the same group of viruses as smallpox but is much less harmful.”

The WHO claims that ‘smallpox’ has been eradicated, although this claim is highly dubious because, as I discussed in my previous article about monkeypox, the vaccine that was used in the so-called ‘eradication programme’ is recognised to have dangerous ‘side effects’ that include death. Well, death is definitely one way to eradicate disease!

One of the more obvious outcomes they are seeking to achieve is to encourage more people to be vaccinated against as many diseases as possible, which is after all, the objective of SDG 3.8 of the 2030 Agenda.

Importantly, African countries, especially those in the sub-Saharan region of the continent, are particular targets for increased vaccine coverage; as demonstrated by a 2015 article entitled WHO strives to provide universal access to immunization in the African Region by 2020, which states the aim to,

“...ensure that every child in the African Region has access to life-saving vaccines.”

I know we are beyond 2020, but this is a typical example of the ongoing efforts to implement vaccination programmes throughout the African continent, especially those areas that they have yet to penetrate, which would seem to be the sub-Saharan region that is the focus of a substantial proportion of the WHO policies.

Another reason for focusing on Africa is because it is claimed that the population of this continent is rising at a faster rate than anywhere else, a statistic that is highly dubious because it is almost certainly based on estimates and extrapolations; there has never been an actual head count of every single person who lives in Africa. Nevertheless, this is the standard narrative used for many aspects of the Agenda, not least of which is so-called ‘climate change’, which will be the topic of a separate article.

According to the Population Reference Bureau (PRB) web page, 2017 World Population Data Sheet, the world population is projected to reach 9.8 billion by 2050 and that,

“…Africa’s population will more than double to 2.6 billion by 2050…”

The purpose of this statement is clearly to instil fear; it is intended to convey the impression that such a population increase would create a huge ‘problem’, but this claim fails to recognise that Africa, a resource-rich region of the world, is the second largest continent with a land area of approximately 30.3 million km2. It also fails to recognise that, even if this population growth were to occur, the continent would not be overcrowded, nor would Africans be unable to feed themselves, especially if they reject the industrial agriculture system that they are being encouraged to adopt. The Green Revolution failed in India - and it will fail in Africa, as has already been seen.

3. First case of more dangerous mpox found outside Africa

The significance of this latest alleged ‘outbreak’ is that it is claimed to be caused by ‘mpox Clade 1’, which is said to be more severe than ‘Clade 2’ that is the alleged cause of the 2022 ‘public health emergency’.

The person who is claimed to be the first case of mpox outside Africa is said to have been ‘infected’ during a stay there. The article states,

“The news comes just hours after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that the outbreak of mpox in parts of Africa was now a public health emergency of international concern.”

Now isn’t that amazingly convenient? They ‘found’ the only person outside Africa to have seemingly been infected with mpox straight after they made their declaration that this is a a public health emergency. Isn’t it wonderful for them that they found the one person able to ‘prove’ to the world that this story is ‘real’?

The truth is, of course, that it is not real; it’s just more fear-mongering.

So what is their claim based on? How do they ‘know’ this person has been ‘infected’ by a new and more dangerous strain of mpox?

As the WHO website shows, PCR is the test used to determine if a person has been ‘infected’ by mpox.

The problems with the PCR test have been discussed at length elsewhere, but suffice it to say, there is no evidence that this test has the ability to determine whether a person has been infected or is ill with a ‘disease’. It is a meaningless test!

This therefore raises the question: So why are people in Africa ill with this condition?

IF - and this is a big if - there is a genuine increase in people displaying the symptoms attributed to mpox, I would suggest that there are a number of possible factors to consider.

First of all, it’s important to consider the photos we are shown alongside these articles about mpox; they display skin eruptions, which are indicative of the body’s efforts to purge toxins. I cannot give the definitive answer as to the cause(s), but I can offer a few suggestions about some of the possible contributing factors.

One of these factors involves ‘e-waste’, the volume of which is immense, as is its value. This is demonstrated by a May 2015 article entitled Illegally Traded and Dumped E-Waste Worth up to $19 Billion Annually Poses Risks to Health, Deprives Countries of Resources, Says UNEP Report, which states that,

“Each year, the electronic industry – one of the world’s largest and fastest growing – generates up to 41 million tonnes of e-waste from goods such as computers and smart phones.”

As the electronics and telecommunications industries continue to grow, the problem of e-waste will inevitably worsen for ‘developing’ countries; as that 2015 article states,

“Africa and Asia are key destinations for large-scale shipments of hazardous wastes for dumping, and sometimes for recycling.”

Africa is also rich in resources that have to be mined. The conditions in mines are inherently hazardous and mining is a known source of exposure to harmful substances that adversely affect health. More importantly, some of these substances, which are harmless when allowed to remain undisturbed deep within the ground, become hazardous when brought to the surface, because that is not where they ‘belong’. In addition, bringing these substances to the surface means that they no longer play their role underground, which in turn causes even more disruption to the environment that is now out of balance!

As I said at the beginning, there’s more to the narrative of ‘mpox’ than just the money, although money does play a significant role. But I hope I’ve added some more nuance to the story so that we don’t fall into too many traps of thinking we ‘know’ what something is all about.

I would also urge continuing vigilance, especially if we are being asked to contribute to some ‘charity’ that is attempting to ‘help the poor people of Africa’ for example. If you think I’m being mean-spirited, I would suggest you look into how much of the money raised by LiveAid actually helped ‘the poor people of Africa’.

On a lighter note, one thing that has been heartwarming is that the mpox story has been recognised as ridiculous and received a great deal of laughter, which is certainly one of the key methods of dispelling fear.

I recommend the following resources for further reading.

Challenge to "W.H.O.", etc. re "monkeypox virus" fraud/delusion... + FOI evidence + a summit

Lost & Found