It seems that the virus/no virus debate has been re-ignited recently. Or I should say rather, that the flames have been fanned to an even higher level of heat, largely due to posts by Chris Sky...
I completely agree with you. And I appreciate your clear and steady voice.
I think the piece that is missing is this is a system of belief.
Some can't look at it because it calls into question a lifetime (many lifetimes) of beliefs based on trusting a medical system, trusting doctors who are held on high.
This is very disorienting to many.
It's like standing on solid ground one moment and the next everything is upside down.
I agree entirely that it's all to do with people's beliefs and have written about this in other articles.
I just wanted to concentrate on the lack of original evidence in this article - if I covered it all in every article, people would be overwhelmed and may not even try to read them.
I agree with you about the 'theory' part no longer being appropriate. I think 'Terrain Theory' needs to go through a rebranding to something that is more appropriate so we all have a way to refer to it in a couple words, like with Terrain Theory, but dropping the theory, because clearly we are well beyond that now. I don't think that No Virus is the best substitution either, because it's defining the 'movement' (also not a good term) by what it is not.
Dawn, I think you and all the other beautiful humans that have being doing all the hard work investigating and disseminating the information to the rest of us need to put your beautiful minds together and come up with better descriptive term.
To show you how hard the establishment will go to gas light us... Just pop "Terrain Theory" into Wikipedia and see what comes up. Spoiler Alert! "Germ theory denialism"
"Germ theory denialism is the pseudoscientific belief that germs do not cause infectious disease, and that the germ theory of disease is wrong.[1] It usually involves arguing that Louis Pasteur's model of infectious disease was wrong, and that Antoine Béchamp's was right. In fact, its origins are rooted in Béchamp's empirically disproven (in the context of disease) theory of pleomorphism.[2] Another obsolete variation is known as terrain theory and postulates that the state of the internal environment determines if germs cause disease rather than germs being the sole cause of it.[3] "
If you listen to my presentation for Crazz Files, you will hear me cite the medical establishment admission that not all micro-organisms are pathogens.
The problem with “Terrain Theory” is that it is not a theory and still contains baseless assumptions of germ theory (pathogenic microbes) which claim that people with robust “terrains” are immune to pathogenic microbes. Pathogenicity is a myth...period.
Thank you. I am aware that 'terrain' isn't a theory. It is unfortunate that some people still believe 'terrain' is based on the 'immune system' and this is a hurdle we have to help them get over - if they'll listen.
That is not my perspective, of course. We do not have an 'immune system' as described because our bodies do not 'fight germs'.
I feel " they" have overplayed their hand this time and the majority of people will not go along with the next fake virus nonsense. I do however still see many people living in fear. Maybe the tide is about to turn! Here's hoping.
Yes, I agree. I think the more ridiculous it all gets, the easier it is for more people to see through it. I also believe the tide is turning, so we have to keep going. 😊
4 years ago I was ill with worry due to believing a killer virus was on its way to these shores. You are the first person I remember listening to that changed my understanding of how things are. I no longer live in fear. Thank you ❤
Wow, that brought tears to my eyes, literally. That is how I see the truth of terrain with regards to health. It's the remedy to the fear-mongering that we have been subjected to. What a blessing to have relief from that fear.
Chris Sky is calling team no-virus a psy-op now? Isnt he the guy who tried to challenge the existence of SARS-COV2 in court (I think it was in Canada?) in an attempt to get his legal fines/tickets dropped for not masking??? Or am I getting him confused with someone else?
I feel like I distinctly remember him talking about issues with isolation back in 2020/2021. Maybe he didn't explain or convey it 100% accurately, but still an important conversation - especially with a large audience who may become interested in digging deeper into germ falsities.
Now he is doing a 180, and has the audacity to call team no-virus a PSY-OP!?!?!? 😂 good lord, these people are not living in reality.
A good debate between Virus vs No-Virus has yet to take place. There are actually a couple of debates needed beforehand >>
#1-- Do you believe it is possible to invent such a fraud as Germ Theory and for people to profit from it?
#2-- Are Koch's Postulates still relevant even though they were "invented" in the 1800s?
#3 -- Has the US/UK Government ever lied to its citizens?
If the debater doesn't believe such a fraud could be invented and that people could profit from it, then there's no point in debating the Germ Theory Fraud.
If the debater doesn't believe Koch's Postulates are still relevant, then no Germ Theory Fraud debate can take place.
If the debater doesn't believe the Governments lie to their citizens, then there is no point in debating the Germ Theory Fraud.
The first question to the 'virus' people would be "where is the original scientific evidence that definitively proves that the particles you call viruses exist as distinct entites in nature that conform to your definition?"
They won't be able to do that, so there would be no further questions to ask. Debate over!
For over 30 years I've used people's acceptance of global warming 'theories' as an indication of their closed-mindedness and the quality of their thinking generally. More recently I've added virus 'theory' as another indicator. Note: this is just a personal belief - beating people over the head with it never works.
Thank you Dawn. You continue to apply common sense and courageously question the dogma. God bless you 🙏🏼
While a few may have come around, most haven’t. The ones pushing viruses but against the clot clots seem to have hardened. They are emotionally bonded with the likes of RFK, Jr. are refuse to question his stance on Israel.
There’s so much confusion in most of the population. Your words are an antidote for me.
I agree, sadly there is still too much confusion and overwhelm for a lot of people.
I'm doing my best to reach those who are not happy with those popular viewpoints and are willing to listen to a different perspective, one that is not fear-based.
I'm of the opinion that there was NO virus, it was never really proven (let alone all the other viruses in history), the reports of hospitals being crowded w/ deathly ill patients was largely hyperbole (some nurses have come forward to admit this), news media (aka the enemedia) helped blow this all out of proportion with their non-stop repetitive content propaganda fed by govt officials, NGOs, medical professionals(?), celebrities, etc., who were all paid off and/or incentivized to tow the party line. And what better way to seize the public's imagination (as has always been done in the past) through an invisible enemy. This was all a total mind f*ck of humanity and an overarching attempt to--not only control us--but wipe us off the planet in an economic move to steal/preserve the wealth of the rich. (rant over!)
Our current medical system cannot recognize that any disease can be caused by an absence of healthiness and therefore cured with healthiness. No current medical reference documents a cure for scurvy. The cure is not a patent medicine that kills an invisible germ, so it doesn't count. There is little difference between the virus theories and the theories of witch doctors sticking needles into dolls.
As the 'pandemic' was apparently planned, was it planned to coincide with the roll out of 5G and are you sure Wuhan was the first city to have the towers?
If the EMF was causing the symptoms, why did some suffer and others not? Would the symptoms come on straight away or a few days after exposure? Could a person suffering symptoms pass them on to somebody else or would they have to be subject to the say toxin (EMF?) as the original individual?
Thank you for your reply and the information. Gives me much to ponder as my experience of the pandemic didn't entirely fit this theory. I am pretty fit and healthy but had symptoms, yet none of my elderly relatives had any problems until they had the "vaccines". Fit athletes and young doctors developed symptoms all over the world.
The Iranian governmnet officials pubicly suffered at a press confernce, I recall. They were not very old or sickly looking. President Hassan Rouhani on 25 February 2020 called CV19 "one of the enemy's plots to bring our country into closure by spreading panic" so maybe he was picked upon for special attention!
I do get that radiation damage can look like flu but I didn't have typical flu symptoms, in my view.
Do you think that somebody with radiation damage/Cv19 symptoms could pass it on to somebody out of the area who they later meet? I know that somebody without any symptoms is very unlikely to pass anything on to anybody else.
There are detox organs and a lymphatic system - to eliminate waste - and there are processes that aid the body in taking up critical nutrients & minerals. The "immune system" was created by the Rockefeller medical industrial complex to explain away why SOME people get sick and others don't. It is just another germ theory ASSUMPTION.
I have perused HUNDREDS of articles, papers, videos and a dozen books on germ theory fraud and your simple explanation is one of the best. This is a key point of understanding regarding our "health system" and its primary function. Thank you!
I cannot take credit for coming to that conclusion on my own - it was Tracy Northern's writings that got me there 😉 along with my stubborn urge to question everything, of course (but I am certain that Dawn and others have probably discussed the immune system fallacy at some point too.... sometimes it is just a matter of finding the right information at the right time)
I have talked and written about the fact that we don't have an immune system. The whole concept of the 'immune system' is based on the idea that it 'fights germs' but the body knows there are no germs to fight.
Tireless work, isn't it Dawn!
Thank you for the time you put in to shine the light on the truth. It seems so obvious, and it is, but the indoctrinated cannot, or will not, see.
Thank you. 🙏
I know some won't see, but I still believe there are many who are willing to look. We've come this far, so I'm not giving up now. ❤️
I completely agree with you. And I appreciate your clear and steady voice.
I think the piece that is missing is this is a system of belief.
Some can't look at it because it calls into question a lifetime (many lifetimes) of beliefs based on trusting a medical system, trusting doctors who are held on high.
This is very disorienting to many.
It's like standing on solid ground one moment and the next everything is upside down.
Many just can't do it. It's too disturbing.
Thank you. 🙏
I agree entirely that it's all to do with people's beliefs and have written about this in other articles.
I just wanted to concentrate on the lack of original evidence in this article - if I covered it all in every article, people would be overwhelmed and may not even try to read them.
I understand.
I think your approach is great.
Many on the side of "Freedom" or "Truth" don't realize yet how powerful beliefs like Terrain Theory can be towards combating the establishment.
It's bringing about the greatest amount of change with the least amount of effort.
I would have to say that Terrain is not a 'theory', nor is it a belief.
It is, as you say, incredibly powerful and a great tool to help encourage people to see their body and their health from a very different perspective.
Would, "A way of living" be more appropriate?
Yes, definitely.
I like the concept of “Terrain” as a paradigm or as a life philosophy. Of course “a way of living” (@Jonathan) is a very good description.
I agree with you about the 'theory' part no longer being appropriate. I think 'Terrain Theory' needs to go through a rebranding to something that is more appropriate so we all have a way to refer to it in a couple words, like with Terrain Theory, but dropping the theory, because clearly we are well beyond that now. I don't think that No Virus is the best substitution either, because it's defining the 'movement' (also not a good term) by what it is not.
Dawn, I think you and all the other beautiful humans that have being doing all the hard work investigating and disseminating the information to the rest of us need to put your beautiful minds together and come up with better descriptive term.
To show you how hard the establishment will go to gas light us... Just pop "Terrain Theory" into Wikipedia and see what comes up. Spoiler Alert! "Germ theory denialism"
True! And 'terrain' isn't even a theory!
Here's what Wiki actually states,
"Germ theory denialism is the pseudoscientific belief that germs do not cause infectious disease, and that the germ theory of disease is wrong.[1] It usually involves arguing that Louis Pasteur's model of infectious disease was wrong, and that Antoine Béchamp's was right. In fact, its origins are rooted in Béchamp's empirically disproven (in the context of disease) theory of pleomorphism.[2] Another obsolete variation is known as terrain theory and postulates that the state of the internal environment determines if germs cause disease rather than germs being the sole cause of it.[3] "
If you listen to my presentation for Crazz Files, you will hear me cite the medical establishment admission that not all micro-organisms are pathogens.
The contradictions are rife!!
The problem with “Terrain Theory” is that it is not a theory and still contains baseless assumptions of germ theory (pathogenic microbes) which claim that people with robust “terrains” are immune to pathogenic microbes. Pathogenicity is a myth...period.
Thank you. I am aware that 'terrain' isn't a theory. It is unfortunate that some people still believe 'terrain' is based on the 'immune system' and this is a hurdle we have to help them get over - if they'll listen.
That is not my perspective, of course. We do not have an 'immune system' as described because our bodies do not 'fight germs'.
YES! I just read Mike Stone's exchange with Sky. As Bugs bunny would say: "What a Moroon!"
My memory is of 'ultramaroon'.
I don't think the term "Ultra" was even invented back in 1959 when I first heard it. Heh!
I took it as a corruption of the colour ultramarine - from the Latin ultramarinus. I can imagine cartoonists making that joke amongst themselves!
I looked it up. The Older Bugs did my take. The Newer Bugs said yours. Cheers.
Is it 'Bugs' that is/are making people sick.
LOL
Interesting take. We kids took it as Bugs not knowing how to pronounce Moron. Which, Ironically, made him look like one.
Thank you for your tenacity Dawn.
I feel " they" have overplayed their hand this time and the majority of people will not go along with the next fake virus nonsense. I do however still see many people living in fear. Maybe the tide is about to turn! Here's hoping.
Thank you. 🙏
Yes, I agree. I think the more ridiculous it all gets, the easier it is for more people to see through it. I also believe the tide is turning, so we have to keep going. 😊
I am so grateful for people like you. Keeps me going and with a smile on my face!
Your kind words mean a lot to me, thank you so much. ❤️
Your hard work means a lot to me.
4 years ago I was ill with worry due to believing a killer virus was on its way to these shores. You are the first person I remember listening to that changed my understanding of how things are. I no longer live in fear. Thank you ❤
And your words mean a great deal to me, more than words can say.
Thank you. ❤️🙏
🙏
Wow, that brought tears to my eyes, literally. That is how I see the truth of terrain with regards to health. It's the remedy to the fear-mongering that we have been subjected to. What a blessing to have relief from that fear.
Yes it really is a blessing.
I consider the tide turned in 2022 and as Churchill said
Churchill: "This is not the end" (nov. 1942)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdRH5wzCQQw&t=13s
If you have a wry sense of humour you might appreciate this or at least some of it.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-great-covid-retest
That is exactly how I feel now. The fear has been removed about illnesses. I haven't had so much as a sniffle for three years.
Chris Sky is calling team no-virus a psy-op now? Isnt he the guy who tried to challenge the existence of SARS-COV2 in court (I think it was in Canada?) in an attempt to get his legal fines/tickets dropped for not masking??? Or am I getting him confused with someone else?
I feel like I distinctly remember him talking about issues with isolation back in 2020/2021. Maybe he didn't explain or convey it 100% accurately, but still an important conversation - especially with a large audience who may become interested in digging deeper into germ falsities.
Now he is doing a 180, and has the audacity to call team no-virus a PSY-OP!?!?!? 😂 good lord, these people are not living in reality.
I believe you are correct that it was him.
So yes, it's really odd that he's calling it a psyop!!
Well said. It is tiresome to repeat the truth to the extremely dim or perversely persistent but it must be done.
A good debate between Virus vs No-Virus has yet to take place. There are actually a couple of debates needed beforehand >>
#1-- Do you believe it is possible to invent such a fraud as Germ Theory and for people to profit from it?
#2-- Are Koch's Postulates still relevant even though they were "invented" in the 1800s?
#3 -- Has the US/UK Government ever lied to its citizens?
If the debater doesn't believe such a fraud could be invented and that people could profit from it, then there's no point in debating the Germ Theory Fraud.
If the debater doesn't believe Koch's Postulates are still relevant, then no Germ Theory Fraud debate can take place.
If the debater doesn't believe the Governments lie to their citizens, then there is no point in debating the Germ Theory Fraud.
The first question to the 'virus' people would be "where is the original scientific evidence that definitively proves that the particles you call viruses exist as distinct entites in nature that conform to your definition?"
They won't be able to do that, so there would be no further questions to ask. Debate over!
For over 30 years I've used people's acceptance of global warming 'theories' as an indication of their closed-mindedness and the quality of their thinking generally. More recently I've added virus 'theory' as another indicator. Note: this is just a personal belief - beating people over the head with it never works.
Thank you Dawn. You continue to apply common sense and courageously question the dogma. God bless you 🙏🏼
While a few may have come around, most haven’t. The ones pushing viruses but against the clot clots seem to have hardened. They are emotionally bonded with the likes of RFK, Jr. are refuse to question his stance on Israel.
There’s so much confusion in most of the population. Your words are an antidote for me.
Thank you. 🙏
I agree, sadly there is still too much confusion and overwhelm for a lot of people.
I'm doing my best to reach those who are not happy with those popular viewpoints and are willing to listen to a different perspective, one that is not fear-based.
I'm of the opinion that there was NO virus, it was never really proven (let alone all the other viruses in history), the reports of hospitals being crowded w/ deathly ill patients was largely hyperbole (some nurses have come forward to admit this), news media (aka the enemedia) helped blow this all out of proportion with their non-stop repetitive content propaganda fed by govt officials, NGOs, medical professionals(?), celebrities, etc., who were all paid off and/or incentivized to tow the party line. And what better way to seize the public's imagination (as has always been done in the past) through an invisible enemy. This was all a total mind f*ck of humanity and an overarching attempt to--not only control us--but wipe us off the planet in an economic move to steal/preserve the wealth of the rich. (rant over!)
Our current medical system cannot recognize that any disease can be caused by an absence of healthiness and therefore cured with healthiness. No current medical reference documents a cure for scurvy. The cure is not a patent medicine that kills an invisible germ, so it doesn't count. There is little difference between the virus theories and the theories of witch doctors sticking needles into dolls.
To your health, Tracy
Author: A New Theory of Cure
Interesting comment. A few questions, if I may.
As the 'pandemic' was apparently planned, was it planned to coincide with the roll out of 5G and are you sure Wuhan was the first city to have the towers?
If the EMF was causing the symptoms, why did some suffer and others not? Would the symptoms come on straight away or a few days after exposure? Could a person suffering symptoms pass them on to somebody else or would they have to be subject to the say toxin (EMF?) as the original individual?
Thank you for your reply and the information. Gives me much to ponder as my experience of the pandemic didn't entirely fit this theory. I am pretty fit and healthy but had symptoms, yet none of my elderly relatives had any problems until they had the "vaccines". Fit athletes and young doctors developed symptoms all over the world.
The Iranian governmnet officials pubicly suffered at a press confernce, I recall. They were not very old or sickly looking. President Hassan Rouhani on 25 February 2020 called CV19 "one of the enemy's plots to bring our country into closure by spreading panic" so maybe he was picked upon for special attention!
I do get that radiation damage can look like flu but I didn't have typical flu symptoms, in my view.
Do you think that somebody with radiation damage/Cv19 symptoms could pass it on to somebody out of the area who they later meet? I know that somebody without any symptoms is very unlikely to pass anything on to anybody else.
There is no such thing as an immune system.
There are detox organs and a lymphatic system - to eliminate waste - and there are processes that aid the body in taking up critical nutrients & minerals. The "immune system" was created by the Rockefeller medical industrial complex to explain away why SOME people get sick and others don't. It is just another germ theory ASSUMPTION.
I have perused HUNDREDS of articles, papers, videos and a dozen books on germ theory fraud and your simple explanation is one of the best. This is a key point of understanding regarding our "health system" and its primary function. Thank you!
I cannot take credit for coming to that conclusion on my own - it was Tracy Northern's writings that got me there 😉 along with my stubborn urge to question everything, of course (but I am certain that Dawn and others have probably discussed the immune system fallacy at some point too.... sometimes it is just a matter of finding the right information at the right time)
I have talked and written about the fact that we don't have an immune system. The whole concept of the 'immune system' is based on the idea that it 'fights germs' but the body knows there are no germs to fight.