Not another new scary variant!!

First of all, I apologise for the hiatus in my writings, I have been away.

It was obvious that the ‘would-be controllers’ were not going to give up easily and simply let us get on with living our lives in peace and freedom. That doesn’t mean this is not possible of course; we just have to stand our ground, but that means we have to make sure we see through their propaganda, whatever form it takes, so we don’t allow ourselves to be drawn into it.

Although they were clearly going to roll out another scam, the burning (no pun intended) question was: What were they going to use as their narrative? Was the next psy-op going to be an alien invasion to unite us all against a common enemy? Or was it going to be a new version of ‘climate change’? ‘Global boiling’ was definitely being pushed as a narrative that was fuelled (again, no pun intended) by the increased numbers of fires, often referred to as ‘wildfires’ most of which have been shown to be far from ‘natural’!

So it was rather a surprise that ‘they’ have chosen to roll out another ‘scary variant’ narrative! Surely they have realised that there is a large and increasing number of people who have seen through the ‘pathogenic virus’ lie?

Or are they testing us?

It is my fervent hope that this time around, even more people will see through the nonsense because they have become better acquainted with the situation we face. However, there are still many people who have yet to even realise that ‘Covid’ was and still is all nonsense; they are totally unaware that there is no evidence for the existence of any ‘pathogenic virus’, so there can be no such thing as a ‘variant’.

Unfortunately, many of us who have stated that there is no evidence for the existence of ‘pathogenic viruses’ are now being vilified in what seems to be a campaign to discredit us. Most of the tactics being used are simply logical fallacies. For example, in addition to being called ‘conspiracy theorists’ - ad hominem - we are also being called out as ‘unqualified’ - appeal to authority.

None of these comments are suitable responses to the information we share and our requests for evidence from the people who claim that ‘viruses cause disease’. After all, the burden of proof lies with those who propose a theory - and all we are asking is “Please provide us with your evidence”.

Sadly, some of this criticism has been made by people who are vocal in their condemnation of vaccines, a position with which I heartily agree. However, they then proceed to insist that there are such entities as ‘pathogenic viruses’, yet fail to provide genuine scientific evidence and merely cite their years of clinical practice as proof - see below for Christine Massey’s excellent response to Dr Vernon Coleman.

A response to Dr Vernon Coleman about "germs"

I wonder whether Dr Coleman realises that he is the one causing division. He really should read Dr Mark Bailey’s excellent essay A Farewell to Virology to see the depth to which the subject has been researched.

One of the reasons that it is more important than ever for people to be aware of the lack of evidence for ‘pathogenic viruses’ is because the focus of the campaign is the roll out of more injections, and not just for so-called ‘Covid’ but for the ‘flu’ as well, which is similarly not caused by any ‘virus’. Furthermore, there is no evidence that any vaccine is capable of preventing any ‘disease’ because that is not how the body actually works!!

Unsurprisingly, of course, the BBC has joined the campaign to promote vaccines, as can be seen in the article entitled Covid and flu winter jabs to be brought forward in England that begins,

“Vaccines to protect at-risk people against Covid and flu this winter will be rolled out a month earlier than planned in England, because of the emergence of a new Covid variant.”

The ‘at-risk’ category is said to include people over 65, older adult care home residents and immunosuppressed people. This statement is followed by the comment that,

“The plan is to jab as many eligible people as possible by 31 October.”

Is it just me, or does the reference to ‘jabbing people’ also strike you as rather inappropriate? After all, the article refers to ‘vaccines’, so why don’t they use the word ‘vaccinate’?

A clue can be found in the Merriam-Webster online dictionary that provides a few definitions of the word ‘jab’; it is the 3rd definition that I find to be of particular interest and of some concern!

1a: to pierce or prod (someone or something) with or as if with a pointed object

1b: to push or drive (something, such as a pointed object) quickly, abruptly, or forcefully

2: to strike (someone or something) with a short straight blow

3: to pointedly tease or mock (someone)

We know that ‘they’ are aware of what they are doing; they definitely choose their words and ‘spells’ carefully and with intention!

So the question is: Are we being mocked? I suspect so, which is yet another reason to share the information contained within this and my other articles with as many people as possible, as soon as possible so they can make informed decisions about whether they want to be jabbed/mocked.

But the mockery does not end there.

The new variant has been labelled BA.2.86; but it has also been given a name: Pirola, the definition of which, according to Wiktionary is:

In addition to this mockery is their obvious attempt to sow seeds of confusion; for example, the CDC web page entitled Risk Assessment Summary for SARS CoV-2 Sublineage BA.2.86 states that,

“BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines.”

Note the use of the term ‘may be more capable’; clearly, they have not yet proven their claim.

Yet at the same time, the CDC recommendations for ‘Preventive Actions’ includes,

“Get your COVID-19 vaccines, as recommended.”

This begs the question: How can they make this recommendation at the same time as claiming that people who have received the vaccine may be more vulnerable to ‘infection’.

This is a complete failure of logic.

Surely it’s time for people to realise we are being mocked and that this is all a farce, although not a very funny one for those people who have been directly or indirectly affected by these injections.

The BBC article highlights the lack of knowledge about this ‘variant’ and would seem to be sounding a note of caution in the statement that,

“Dame Jenny Harries, chief executive of the UKHSA, said new Covid variants were expected to emerge and there was limited information on BA.2.86 at the moment.

“As with all emergent and circulating Covid-19 variants - both in the UK and internationally - we will continue to monitor BA.2.86 and to advise government and the public as we learn more.”

Yet, she too proclaims that,

“In the meantime, please come forward for the vaccine when you are called.”

If there is ‘limited information’ on this variant, then how can they be so confident in the ability of the vaccines to confer immunity? The answer is, of course, that they can’t - even if vaccines were capable of conferring immunity, which they are not.

The scale of the fear-mongering is impressive, yet, according to the CDC web page, under the heading Scientific Understanding of BA.2.86 as of August 23, 2023, the total number of reported cases is: 9. Yes, that’s right this new ‘variant’ has only been detected in 9 people in 5 different countries: Denmark (3), South Africa (2), Israel (1), United States (2) and United Kingdom (1).

On the basis of this, the CDC claims that,

“The identification of these cases in multiple geographies is evidence of international transmission.”

This is nonsense; yet another failure of logic. The fact that 9 people have tested positive (with a meaningless test I may add), is NOT evidence of transmission.

We need to ask the right questions: Is there any actual evidence that any of these people had any direct contact with each other? The CDC does not mention this, which they surely would have done if they had such information because it would ‘prove’ their case.

So, if these 9 people have not had any direct contact with each other, how could the ‘virus’ have been transmitted between them? How did this ‘virus variant’ travel across so many continents? And why are so few people affected if it is so virulent? Who was the first person affected? And how were they affected?

I won’t hold my breath waiting for the answers. And I suggest you don’t either!

It is obvious that, with a clear head and the use of logic and common sense, there is nothing to fear.

The objective of this new propaganda campaign would seem to be to confuse and scare as many people as possible so that many more will agree to the injections they are offering. The solution is therefore to not be confused and scared and the way to achieve this is to become informed that there is no evidence to support the narrative about ‘viruses’. There are many resources available to help achieve this: one of them is the book I co-authored, What Really Makes Yo Ill? Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong.

I do appreciate that most people have neither the time nor the inclination to dig deeply into this topic for themselves, which is the reason I write my articles and provide the information and resources to help you make informed decisions.

I therefore ask that, in order to help stop this nonsense before it gains any real traction, you share this information with as many people as possible, especially those who are only just beginning to realise they have been lied to about many different topics. The more of us who stand up this time and say ‘we do not consent, we will not comply’, the better.

Thank you 🙏

References:

WRMYI

A Farewell to Virology