46 Comments

Funny the name means "penis".... 😂

Truthstream media did a video on it.

https://youtu.be/FEzD3FnsIOc?si=ZvllKXklkmYMmY2Q

So, to prevent the pirola/penis from entering you, take something else 💉 that enters you.

Haha!

This variant nonsense is brought to you by the hype of genetics, a thing that was supposed to cure cancer etc. Haha, even CRISPR failed, despite them claiming it's being used to make the mRNA and other useless tech.

I think we're at the point of a possible paradigm shift.

https://www.simplypsychology.org/kuhn-paradigm.html

Expand full comment
author

Thanks for sharing the video. I realise I'm a little late with this information, but better late than never!!

I agree we are on the cusp of a paradigm shift - I'm doing my best to help usher in the new paradigm.

Expand full comment

I think truthstream is seeing it too, which is why their attitude has changed from doom to absurdity.

Thanks for your work which opened my eyes to the huge issues with germ theory.

You bring a common sense logic that is much easier to understand than the doctors that question it too.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you. 🙏

Expand full comment

Thank you for your excellent analysis, Dawn, but forgive me if I only skim it. There's only so much of the BS 24/7 variant I can take. Hats off for doing what no one else wants to do.

Are we being mocked? Oh and how.

Expand full comment
author

You are forgiven.

I'm really trying to reach people who are relatively new to this and/or to provide resources for people who know what's going on so they can share it with others.

Expand full comment

That's very good of you, Dawn. I take my hat off.

Expand full comment

thank you.

Only one thing. Asking you to get a jab when saying you may catch the "thing" because of previous jab or illness is not a complete failure of logic. Its very clever.

... Sorry, we put you in a position where you gonna have to jab forever... or... sorry, you got a positive PCR (our making again) so you gonna have to jab forever....

Expand full comment
author

It is a clever tactic, I agree and it is intended to trap people. But I'm sure you appreciate that the point I was highlighting is that it doesn't follow logic if they claim that the injection is protective but the injected are MORE susceptible to the new variant.

Expand full comment

Of course. I get it. it is very logical from 'their' point of view. Irrational for us. The missing clue is the 'sorry' part. Thank you again. I will get your book this year to read it.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, that would be really appreciated. 🙏

Expand full comment

Thank you for another great article.

As a recent convert from virus-theory it makes more and more sense to me.

Every year we have a new flu variant in which they can sell vaccines for. Anytime the flu shot doesn't work we're told it's not the flu virus but something else. It is then just labeled as a different type of virus known as a cold. If you get sicker than a dog after being vaccinated than they'll just tell you you didn't have the flu; or you won't even go to the doctor to get a worthless culture because you think you're already protected from the flu. How convenient is that for the flu vaccine pushers? And no two colds are ever the same which is why we never have immunity from catching the next one. Boy, how we had been sold a steaming heap of BS all our lives! And now we have a brand new thing called Covid, like the 'flu', will be with us forever unless once and for all we prove to the world the shots are what is killing them.

But as was the case with me, century-held beliefs are hard to bring down. I cannot even get my own family to take me serious about this topic; even the ones who are now completely anti-vax. I think the best way to approach is to shake people's confidence in the medical industry. The first and most obvious place to do that is by showing them how worthless vaccines are. I don't like the attacks on RFK Jr. He has turned thousands of people around on these vaccines. He is a useful cog in the fight and has a bigger platform in which to speak. We need to work with him, not shun him and perhaps convert him in the process. Agreeing with him on the danger of vaccines and the corrupt medical industry doesn't equal agreement on virus theory. Those people on CHD, whether they believe in viruses or not, have lost all trust in modern medicine. They are right where I was before I began to question the existence of viruses myself and sought to learn more.

Along with vaccines, the other strategy that should be used is to cite the dozens of studies that prove colds, 'flu's' etc. are not passed on from person to person or by surface contact. Countless studies designed to prove this in the most explicit manner have failed to do so and we can even point to our own daily lives as proof of this.

Expand full comment

I had to write a satire piece about the new Scariant. Hold on to your ribs, this one is a giggle-fest!

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/covid2099

Expand full comment
author

I'm reading it now. 😎

Expand full comment

I read it. Do not quit your day job.

Expand full comment

I read your comment. Do not trip over your ego as you enjoy being banned. Ciao chump.

Expand full comment

So much hostility in return for a well-meant advice.

Expand full comment

Welcome back Dawn. Your articles are always pertinent and forceful. I hear the next variant will be called BS 24/7 !

Expand full comment
author

Thank you. Yes, they are all BS 24/7. And the more people that realise that, the better. 😊

Expand full comment

Oh! You must have seen my satirical post on BS.24/7!

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/covid2099

Expand full comment
author

I had seen a few people referring to BS 24/7, but I have only just seen your post, which I've started reading. It's really good that you are writing satire. We all need to just laugh at it all. Laughter is one of the best and quickest ways to remove fear. ❤️

Expand full comment

"None of these comments are suitable responses to the information we share and our requests for evidence from the people who claim that ‘viruses cause disease’. After all, the burden of proof lies with those who propose a theory - and all we are asking is “Please provide us with your evidence”.

Sadly, some of this criticism has been made by people who are vocal in their condemnation of vaccines, a position with which I heartily agree. However, they then proceed to insist that there are such entities as ‘pathogenic viruses’, yet fail to provide genuine scientific evidence and merely cite their years of clinical practice as proof - see below for Christine Massey’s excellent response to Dr Vernon Coleman."

Absolutely! Amazing, how many "scientists" seem to have forgotten the very basic rules of the Scientific Method, they think those are options rather than rules. Or maybe they think they are opinions?

Thanks for the great job, Dawn!!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Jeffrey. 🙏

Expand full comment
Sep 8, 2023Liked by Dawn Lester

Wonderful article, Dawn. I will share now. Thanks!

Expand full comment
author

Thank you Greg, your help and support is much appreciated. 🙏

Expand full comment

happy to see you back from your hiatus -----------and tell Rob(c137) i just subscribe to simplypsychloghy and love the artical and also subscribed to his substack--------- i know it may sound selfess but i actualy enjoy DEEP intellectual thinking and to those fragile eggshelled minds that insist there are viruses i here by officaly regulate them to the poppycock rubbish can of B.S. eternaty----------and yes thier is a pun intended cheers mate------------and no i am not english or australian or new zealand but sometimes pretened to be

Expand full comment
Sep 8, 2023·edited Sep 8, 2023Liked by Dawn Lester

Dawn, I appreciate everything you and David have done to raise awareness about this. I know time is precious; just hope you’ll look into Catherine Austin Fitts at home.solari.com. What it sounds like they’re asking seniors is, “Please come forward so we can put you out of your misery, and get back to stealing what’s left of the money before it’s all gone.”

Expand full comment
author

Thank you. I am aware of her work, although I haven't looked at it lately.

It is obvious that they are targeting seniors, but hopefully, there are many seniors who are still capable of thinking for themselves and won't take any notice. 🤞

Expand full comment

I would like to see the no germ group get together with the nanotechnology group. I am sure you have seen the images and videos of nanotechnology in these vaccines, and it has been shown to be in all big pharma injectables, which would certainly make people ill. So rather than say Sars cov2 is all nonsense, can you address the nanotech poisons?

Expand full comment
author

Nanotech is not the only harmful substance in vaccines. I see you follow Dr Ana Maria Mihalcea. Are you aware of the work of the Bigelsen brothers and Dr Ana Maria Oliva? They are not convinced that the vaccines all contain nanotech.

The point I try to make clear is that there is no reason for the vaccines in the first place.

However, from what I have been able to ascertain, there are different batches of vaccines that contain different ingredients, which would explain the different reactions people have experienced.

Expand full comment

I agree with you on nearly all of your points! This nanotech is not just in the vials but in human blood, whether or not they have the shot. Many of us are curious about what they call shedding. We have had bizarre reactions to vaccinated people, as if they are emitting radiation, etc. It's a topic I hope everyone can research further. I look forward to what you have to say because I know this thing they call sars co v 2 is not just nonsense, even though the story is a lot of bs 24/7.

Expand full comment

In a previous life I was a journalist. If one writes an article and needs to use a certain term several times, one starts to look voor other words with the same meaning - to prevent being repetitive. "Jabs" has become a synonym for vaccination. "Shots" is another word for it, and also has an unpleasant additional meaning. You are reading far too much in what this journalist wrote.

Secondly, I got infected early, March 2020, and have been battling the Long-Covid it turned into for the past few years. I am miserable from an illness you say does not exist ?!

Expand full comment
author

I don't deny that people are ill, so no, I don't deny your illness.

What I am stating is that the idea that it is due to an 'infection' caused by a 'virus' has never been proven.

Expand full comment

So it just comes out of nowhere ? Punishment for my sins ? Not eating enough apples ?

Expand full comment
author

Not at all. There are always reasons that our bodies produce symptoms. They are usually efforts to cleanse and self-heal.

You might like to read my article that explains the 'germ theory' is unproven.

https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/the-germ-theory-a-deadly-fallacy

Expand full comment

So Rabies did/does not exist ? How about Small-Pox ? The Plague ? Tuberculosis ? Malaria ? Leprosy ? Just bodies being busy to cleanse and self-heal ? If that is true, we are doing a lousy job considering how many people have died from those diseases - and are still dying in so-called underdeveloped areas of the world.

Also, what then was the pandemic we just experienced ? A mass-pleasing event ? How does that make sense.

Expand full comment
author

Here's another article you might like to read,

https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/infectious-diseases-dispelling-the

Expand full comment
author

They don't exist in the way we are told, no.

Expand full comment

So what scientists see under microscopes is not there ?

Expand full comment