The very real, but largely hidden health effects of the ‘pandemic’ - part two
As discussed in part one, an emphasis is being placed on ‘mental health’ by the medical establishment. The question is: Why? Is this a real phenomenon?
If you haven’t read part one, here’s the link,
The very real, but largely hidden health effects of the ‘pandemic’ - part one
This is part 1 of what will be a 2- or maybe even 3- part series in order to adequately cover the issues involved and expose the misinformation being reported, because the more I look into this, the more I feel needs to be discussed! The topic that has caught my eye recently is related to ‘mental health’ and more specifically to what is referred to in va…
One clue to the possible reason for this emphasis can be gleaned from the WHO web page entitled Mental health, which states, under the heading Overview, that,
“In recent years, there has been increasing acknowledgement of the important role mental health plays in achieving global development goals, as illustrated by the inclusion of mental health in the Sustainable Development Goals.”
The web page refers to the June 2022 World Mental Health Report: Transforming Mental Health for All. Another WHO web page specifically related to the Report states,
“Mental health is critically important to everyone, everywhere. All over the world, mental health needs are high but responses are insufficient and inadequate. The World mental health report: transforming mental health for all is designed to inspire and inform better mental health for everyone everywhere.”(emphasis in original)
A key phrase to note in the above is the reference to the responses being ‘insufficient and inadequate’. In other words, the medical establishment would like to increase their ability to intervene in the field of mental health.
But what exactly does the WHO mean by ‘mental health’? According to their June 2022 Mental health fact sheet,
“Mental health is a state of mental well-being that enables people to cope with the stresses of life, realize their abilities, learn well and work well, and contribute to their community.”
Although acknowledging that ‘mental health’ is more than just the absence of mental illness, the fact sheet also states that,
“Mental health conditions include mental disorders and psychosocial disabilities as well as other mental states associated with significant distress, impairment in functioning, or risk of self-harm. People with mental health conditions are more likely to experience lower levels of mental well-being, but this is not always or necessarily the case.”
The idea that people with mental health conditions may not experience ‘lower levels of mental well-being’ strikes me as rather incongruous; especially when mental well-being is part of the definition of mental health. I suspect that this last sentence may permit a situation in which a person could be diagnosed with a ‘mental health problem’ when there is nothing wrong with them; a worrying situation indeed!
The reason for including the above WHO statements is to demonstrate that ‘mental health’ is not solely regarded as a health issue, but is intimately interconnected to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, also known as the ‘Global Goals’. This very real ‘agenda’ is not a conspiracy theory; its purpose is to ‘transform’ our lives, allegedly for the better, but on closer inspection, the proposed ‘responses’ will not and cannot improve people’s health, whether mental or physical.
If you are wondering what all of this has to do with the ‘pandemic’, the answer is: Quite a lot!
The ‘pandemic’ is claimed to be one of the factors responsible for delays in the level of progress the establishment had hoped to achieve by 2023 in order to meet their goals by 2030. This is admitted on the UN web page about Goal 3: Good health and well-being, that states,
“The COVID-19 pandemic and other ongoing crises have impeded progress towards Goal 3.”
For those of you who are aware that the ‘pandemic’ was not ‘real’, this statement may seem to be somewhat of a paradox, because it shows that they are blaming delays on a false narrative that they created themselves. One of the other crises they refer to is ‘climate change’, another false narrative!
Nevertheless, I suppose we should be grateful for the fact that their agenda is not going according to plan!
The UN web page about Goal 3 also states that,
“Childhood vaccinations have experienced the largest decline in three decades, and tuberculosis and malaria deaths have increased compared with pre-pandemic levels.”
Although this statement would seem to suggest that the decline in vaccinations and rise in deaths are related, this is misleading. The rise in TB and malaria deaths - if these statistics are true, of course - is not due to a decline in childhood vaccinations.
But that does not stop the continued propaganda, because, under the heading What can I do to help? is the comment that,
“You can start by promoting and protecting your own health and the health of those around you, by making well-informed choices, practicing safe sex and vaccinating your children.”
So what does the above have to do with mental health?
I would suggest the answer is: Everything.
First of all, it perpetuates the notion that there was a genuine ‘pandemic’. This in turn perpetuates a belief in ‘infectious diseases’ and ‘pathogenic viruses’, and in vaccinations as suitable preventives; but this belief is based on theories that have never been proven to be true. This belief also maintains the notion that people need to continue to defer to ‘medical experts’ for information about their health, which inevitably includes their mental health.
The perceived requirement to defer to medical experts is demonstrated by one of the ‘key facts’ on the WHO June 2022 Mental health fact sheet that states,
“Affordable, effective and feasible strategies exist to promote, protect and restore mental health.”
The main factors to note with respect to the medical establishment’s idea of mental health problems can be seen by one of the ‘key facts’ of the WHO June 2022 Mental disorders fact sheet that states,
“Mental disorders involve significant disturbances in thinking, emotional regulation, or behaviour.”
In other words, they are making judgments about our thinking, emotions and behaviours! This is highlighted by the list of of ‘disorders’, one of which is labelled Disruptive behaviour and dissocial disorders, about which the fact sheet states,
“40 million people, including children and adolescents, were living with conduct-dissocial disorder in 2019 (1). This disorder, also known as conduct disorder, is one of two disruptive behaviour and dissocial disorders, the other is oppositional defiant disorder. Disruptive behaviour and dissocial disorders are characterised by persistent behaviour problems such as persistently defiant or disobedient to behaviours that persistently violate the basic rights of others or major age-appropriate societal norms, rules, or laws.”
And this is where we get to the heart of the matter.
Whilst I acknowledge that some behaviours exhibited by children and adolescents, and sometimes even adults, may not be socially acceptable, it is a completely different matter to label a wide range of behaviours as ‘not normal’. One of the main problems with this approach is that it permits certain members of society, namely, the medical establishment - or to be more accurate, those who create the rules for the medical establishment - to determine what is ‘normal’ and make us abide by those ‘rules’.
This is totally unacceptable!
There may be genuine reasons that children exhibit certain behaviours, in a school setting for example, that are perceived to be disruptive. These reasons can include sheer boredom because what they are being taught is not stimulating either intellectually or creatively, an increasingly common situation. There could also be genuine emotional issues or even traumas that cause them to behave in a disruptive manner, but these will not be resolved by labelling these children as ‘abnormal’ in some way.
One of the insidious aspects of this move towards labelling children and adolescents with one of these conditions is that it could be extended to apply to children who are homeschooled, an option that increasing numbers of parents are choosing. The reason this needs to be considered is because homeschooled children are more likely to ask questions of anyone who tries to tell them what to do. This could give rise to the belief that these children are behaving in a way that can be described as ‘disruptive’ or defiant’, purely as the result of learning how to think for themselves and not merely take orders from an adult.
Although this may not seem to have any relation to a discussion about dementia, there is a connection, which is that people are being given labels with respect to their emotions, thinking, and behaviours. And this has the potential to allow for labels to be placed on adults who display behaviours that are not in line with the mainstream views - such as the refusal to comply with mask mandates perhaps? This could be the thin end of the wedge for those of us who believe in freedom - if we do not call it out now!
Please note: I have decided not to discuss epilepsy and stroke in this article because they are more complex conditions than dementia.
Whilst I’m not denying the existence of conditions where people are no longer capable of performing the most basic functions, there are more subtle experiences, such as ‘brain fog’ and ‘diminished brain power’, which the media seem to be suggesting are symptoms that may indicate early onset dementia.
There are reasons that people may experience diminished brain power, prolonged stress being one of them. However, there is also the placebo, or rather nocebo effect that cannot be dismissed. The phenomenon known as the nocebo effect is incredibly powerful. It has been shown in clinical trials that people who believed they were receiving a genuine chemotherapy drug, but in fact received a placebo, nevertheless experienced some of the known chemotherapy ‘side effects’, including vomiting and hair loss.
I would therefore draw your attention to the statement on the WHO web page entitled Mental health and COVID-19 that,
“Fear, worry, and stress are normal responses to perceived or real threats, and at times when we are faced with uncertainty or the unknown. So it is normal and understandable that people are experiencing fear in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Note the reference to ‘perceived’ threats. In other words, the threat does not have to be real for the body to feel the emotion of fear and experience stress, both of which can manifest real effects within the body.
The so-called ‘pandemic’ was only ever a perceived threat, not a real one!
It is therefore entirely possible, and I would suggest extremely likely, that some people who read media reports that refer to brain fog, diminished brain power, and dementia, all in the same article, may start to believe that they ‘have’ this condition, a belief that may become a self-fulfilling prophecy; in other words, the nocebo effect in action.
The emphasis on the rise in ‘dementia’ can be seen in the WHO March 2023 Dementia fact sheet, which claims that,
“Currently more than 55 million people have dementia worldwide, over 60% of whom live in low-and middle-income countries. Every year, there are nearly 10 million new cases.”
Although statistics like these must be viewed with some scepticism, it is nevertheless intriguing that the majority of cases of dementia are claimed to occur in ‘low-and middle-income countries’, which raises the inevitable question: Is there a direct relationship between income and mental health? I would suggest that there isn’t, especially as the fact sheet defines dementia as follows,
“Dementia is a term for several diseases that affect memory, thinking, and the ability to perform daily activities.”
Why should these effects be more prevalent in low- and middle-income countries? Or is this just a manipulation of statistics? I accept of course that financial worries can lead to stress, but they do not represent a new phenomenon. Furthermore, financial worries certainly exist in so-called ‘high-income countries’.
I would also add that the majority of the world population lives in what are described as low- and middle-income countries; which means that the emphasis on the alleged plight of the people in these countries is, at the very least misleading, if not downright dishonest.
The fact sheet further claims that,
“Dementia is a syndrome that can be caused by a number of diseases which over time destroy nerve cells and damage the brain, typically leading to deterioration in cognitive function (i.e. the ability to process thought) beyond what might be expected from the usual consequences of biological ageing. While consciousness is not affected, the impairment in cognitive function is commonly accompanied, and occasionally preceded, by changes in mood, emotional control, behaviour, or motivation.”
Consciousness is not affected because it does not exist within the brain!
As discussed in part one, the medical establishment admits to there being no ‘cure’ for dementia, but there are suggested ways to help maintain the quality of life, which include,
being physically active
taking part in activities and social interactions that stimulate the brain and maintain daily function.
These activities were amongst those curtailed during the lockdown periods!
The medical establishment also admits to not knowing very much about Alzheimer’s Disease, which is claimed to be the main form of dementia. On the website of the National Institute on Aging (NIA), which is part of the NIH, is a page entitled What Causes Alzheimer’s Disease? It states,
“Scientists don't yet fully understand what causes Alzheimer's disease in most people. The causes probably include a combination of age-related changes in the brain, along with genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. The importance of any one of these factors in increasing or decreasing the risk of Alzheimer's disease may differ from person to person.”
Yet, despite their acknowledged lack of understanding of the cause(s), they are nevertheless confident to claim that they can ‘treat’ people with certain ‘medications’. Some of these are listed on the fact sheet,
Cholinesterase inhibitors like donepezil are used to treat Alzheimer disease.
NMDA receptor antagonists like memantine are used for severe Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia.
Medicines to control blood pressure and cholesterol can prevent additional damage to the brain due to vascular dementia.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) can help with severe symptoms of depression in people living with dementia if lifestyle and social changes don’t work, but these should not be the first option.
It’s important to note the emphasis on ageing as if it’s a problem; the WHO October 2023 fact sheet entitled Mental health of older adults states that,
“The world’s population is ageing fast.”
Many cultures regard their elders with reverence and respect, yet it would seem that the intention of the medical establishment is to foster concern that a growing population of elderly people, a large percentage of whom are experiencing cognitive decline, will impose a huge strain on the ‘health system’.
At the risk of repeating myself, I do acknowledge that some people experience genuine cognitive decline and other symptoms that are diagnosed as a form of ‘dementia’. The point I am aiming to make in this article is that the medical establishment not only does not know the real cause(s), and cannot therefore truly help these people with the treatments they offer, but, with respect to the past 4 years, is largely responsible for some of the increase in cognitive problems through the perpetuation of the unproven idea that there was a ‘pandemic’ caused by a ‘virus’ that could be transmitted between people.
To answer the question: What does cause dementia, I would suggest that, as with all health issues, it will invariably be due to a combination of contributory factors that will differ for each person. These factors will more than likely include exposures to neurotoxic substances and exposures to high or prolonged levels of non-native EMFs, to which I would add prolonged levels of fear, anxiety and trauma.
I would also add that increased levels of fear and stress since early 2020 may have caused some ‘mental health issues’ of a temporary nature, which means that they can be resolved and healed by an understanding that ‘germs’ are not the cause of disease, so they do not need to be feared!
Please Note: Nothing in this article should be construed as providing ‘medical advice’. My purpose is to share information to help people make informed decisions.
There are many ways you can help to support my work, including sharing my articles with your friends, family, and colleagues, as well as through the donate button below.
Thank you. 🙏
If you would like to take a deep dive into the history behind the lack of evidence to support the ‘germ theory’, I highly recommend this article by my good friend Mike Stone,
Their end goal is to label everyone disobeying mandates with oppositional defiant disorder. I don’t care what they say, I won’t take orders from known liars. Having served honorably in the military, I saw how easy it was to be labeled “defiant.” It doesn’t need to be true, just asserted by someone appointed over you. They’re paving the way to assigning ICD codes by Administrators.
Their program/meme " its normal to be in a state of fear" when it is not a normal state for human beings to be in constant stress( which is fear) . Love is our natural state that we have forgotten. And seeing each other as a threat was another convid mind program . You could even say "covid" was fear. Chronic fear( stress) impairs brain function as it blocks access to reasoning. Now, where I am, its still a constant media feed of alarmist programming about weather , its not just a normal windy day its " extreme" this is mixed in with the war propaganda . There is a obsession with the climate where convid use to be. Humanity's increased collective insanity(from fear) looks like "cognitive decline" . And the media spreads it.
Alzheimer's is another made up disease ( label) where people with badly impaired brain function/obvious madness are labelled with it and yet without having "plaques and tangles" . People with dementia are told( nocebo) it will progress to Alzheimer's and they are put on lots of drugs which then in turn seems to be a self full-filling prophecy.
Its never been more important than staying in the present moment and spreading love (like butter on a dry piece of hot toast). Pointing to the wisdom and Self knowledge that is within all , when we know who we are beyond mind and form negates all fear mind programming, so remembering source is essential.