I remember having this children’s book when I was a kid. I can’t for the world remember the title of it (this was 30 years ago, after all - the book itself was probably written 40-50 years ago as well), but it was about your average “super scary and super deadly diseases” like mumps, measles and chicken pox, etc. Basically, unlike the scaremongering of today, the book would just give a brief description of each disease alongside cartoon images of said disease (I can still vividly remember the cartoon image of a kid covered it polka dots to demonstrate chickenpox) and state (I’m paraphrasing) “you’ll feel terrible for a few days and it sucks but you’ll be fine”. It’s pretty amazing how we went from that nonchalant attitude only a couple of decades ago to the “GET VACCINATED OR YOU’LL DIE!!!!” of today.
As I’ve probably mentioned in previous comments, I’m currently pregnant with my first child. It used to really sadden me that it took this long for me to get pregnant (my plan was for it to happen in my 20’s but alas, life had other plans), but after everything I’ve learned during convid, I’m actually really glad that I was forced to wait until now. I hate to admit it but if this child had been born pre-convid, I most likely would have blindly listened to what the doctors said and allowed my child to become pharma’s pincushion and I don’t think I would have been able to forgive myself for that. Thankfully, the child will be born now at a time when my eyes are wide open and I’m able to step in and prevent it from being exposed to all those toxins and that scam. For that, I’m really happy.
I can't speak for vaccines I got when I was too young to remember, but I had to get the MMR vaccine in high school. Two months later I developed a truly horrible skin condition, with itchy painful oozing thickened red patches of skin. It lasted all summer, about three months... luckily it was summer break and I was out of school at that time. This was years ago and it is still the worst health problem I've ever had. I would 1000 times out of 1000 choose a few days of measles over this torture. At the time I knew absolutely nothing about vaccines or vaccine damage, and I did not make the connection until years later... after getting other poison vaccines like Anthrax in the military, but that's another story.
Luckily I eventually learned the truth about this wonderful medical miracle before 'covid' so my stand was already 'absolutely no way in hell' on the 'covid' vaccines (or any other vaccine ever again).
I am unfortunately fully vaxxed since my childhood since my parents never thought to question vaccines or anything the doctor told them.
I don’t remember this myself because I was too young at the time, but my mother told me that I used to suffer from horrible migraines as a young child. They’d get to bad that they thought that I must be suffering from some brain tumors or something. I have a fuzzy memory of spending endless appointments in the doctor’s office where they did every test imaginable to try and figure out what was causing these migraines. They were never able to figure it out and eventually the migraines went away on their own.
I started thinking about those migraines again during convid (after my eyes were opened to the scam) and while I obviously can’t prove that they were caused by either of the vaccines I received as a child, I can’t help but wonder if they are connected anyway. After all, they only started happening after I started receiving the vaccines, never before.
To the great dismay of my mother, I’ve refused every vaccine since then. Not because I thought there was anything wrong with them but because my gut kept telling me to not get them. After looking at the aftermath of the HPV and swine flu jabs, it seems like my gut knew long before I did. I walked into convid with no intention of getting jabbed for that either for the same reason. Fast forward a few years and I’m really glad I listened to my gut even long before my eyes were open to what was going on.
People who watch TV: "So we have this thing called 'adverts' which is when they try to sell us products we don't need with a cheesy sales pitch which plays on our emotions, and sometimes they include clips of people in lab coats to try and make it look all 'sciency' and credible..... and then we have this other thing called 'the news'"
People who do their own research and go for long walks: "Yeah, it's pretty much adverts all the way down...."
Thanks. If that is the case then he hasn't looked very deeply into the history of vaccination and the germ theory. But that's ok. If he's questioning it all, then he will at least be helping to spread 'vaccine hesitancy'.
I think you are right that he still believes in viral transmission of illnesses. But his new career as a film maker is dedicated to warning the public against vaccine harms.
Hi Dawn. Andrew Wakefield has recently confirmed that no Vax is safe based on the fact there have never been comparable placebo trials for any Vax. See his discussion with Dr Malik on Rumble/Odyssey.
That is interesting, thank you for letting me know.
He seems to have changed his position recently, because I heard/read not that long ago that he was still in favour of single vaccines, which is the point I was making in the article.
However, saying that no vax is safe is not the same as saying that no vax is effective. Do you know his view on their alleged effectiveness? That would also be interesting.
I began studying measles in 2016 following the so-called 2014–2015 Disneyland outbreak. That outbreak of 42 cases occurred in December 2014. By February of the next year, two months later, there were 110 cases in California. There also were cases in other states.
“During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees.” and “Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences.” This appeared in the November 2016 issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, the article title is “Rapid Identification of Measles Virus Vaccine Genotype by Real-Time PCR.”
This means:
(1) many-to-most of the “suspected” cases were people who had been recently vaccinated for measles.
(2) 73 out of 194 (38%) of the measles cases were infected by the measles virus present in the vaccine, in other words the vaccine caused the infection.
Measles was orignally diagnosed based on symptoms. By 2015 the CDC required genotyping as a part of the diagnostics. Genotyping is done with a PCR test (!). 24 genotypes had been detected by 2019, they do not reflect strict geographical distribution, which is to say that most have been found in more than one geographical region. Furthermore, “in some populations, complete shifts in the genotype of the strain of measles circulating in the population have been observed, with given genotypes being replaced by new genotypes” [BioMed Central http://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2334-8-44 ]
Thanks to the COVID story, I am very suspicious of any diagnostic use of the PCR test. The determination of clades and genotypes is interesting, but ultimately useless.
Vaccinologists love to believe in the concept of “herd immunity”, by which they mean that if enough people are vaccinated, then everyone will be “safe” from getting an infection. The herd immunity for measles started out at, as I recall, at 70%. It has been increased every time an inexplicable outbreak challenged the theory. Now it is 95%. I am not the only one to conclude herd immunity is a pipe dream.
I am sure you are correct. I thought it was an excuse for why vaccination did not stop people from getting the subject disease. The more I studied the 2015 California measles "outbreak", the more I suspected the official story was wrong - too many observations that did not "fit" the medical explanation.
It would be really interesting to see a comparison. What are your chances of getting any of these alleged viral diseases they are trying to terrorize us over and having one of these extreme responses leading to death, compared to your chances of getting a CONVID 'vaccine' and having a side effect leading to death.
For sure the mainstream won't be doing it. Or if there are still some good, honest scientists who have somehow survived despite the system if they did a study like that it would never be published. But I think the statistics are already there (although everything is tainted of course), so it's just a matter of doing the math on those
If I may add Stefan Lanka's web site, which should be mandatory reading to everyone (delete at will):
https://vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/dr-stefan-lanka-debunks-pictures-of-isolated-viruses/
It's a good resource for that article he wrote, although it is not Dr Lanka's website.
Oh s*** sorry; I had it listed as his site on my saved stuff ... my fault. God I hate IT and my incompetence
PS Found this as well - showing it was mainstream; but we have all forgotten about it (well most anyway) = https://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-a-vaccine-denier-20150320-column.html
He did lose the first round. But the MSM never report that he won the appeal in the higher court - of course.
And I also made an error, it was not an article Stefan Lanka wrote but it was written about him.
Thank you for this article Dawn ❤️🙏🏻
I remember having this children’s book when I was a kid. I can’t for the world remember the title of it (this was 30 years ago, after all - the book itself was probably written 40-50 years ago as well), but it was about your average “super scary and super deadly diseases” like mumps, measles and chicken pox, etc. Basically, unlike the scaremongering of today, the book would just give a brief description of each disease alongside cartoon images of said disease (I can still vividly remember the cartoon image of a kid covered it polka dots to demonstrate chickenpox) and state (I’m paraphrasing) “you’ll feel terrible for a few days and it sucks but you’ll be fine”. It’s pretty amazing how we went from that nonchalant attitude only a couple of decades ago to the “GET VACCINATED OR YOU’LL DIE!!!!” of today.
As I’ve probably mentioned in previous comments, I’m currently pregnant with my first child. It used to really sadden me that it took this long for me to get pregnant (my plan was for it to happen in my 20’s but alas, life had other plans), but after everything I’ve learned during convid, I’m actually really glad that I was forced to wait until now. I hate to admit it but if this child had been born pre-convid, I most likely would have blindly listened to what the doctors said and allowed my child to become pharma’s pincushion and I don’t think I would have been able to forgive myself for that. Thankfully, the child will be born now at a time when my eyes are wide open and I’m able to step in and prevent it from being exposed to all those toxins and that scam. For that, I’m really happy.
Yes, it is crazy how these diseases are made to be so scary, when it's admitted that they only last a week or so.
You have mentioned your situation before. How are you?
I can't speak for vaccines I got when I was too young to remember, but I had to get the MMR vaccine in high school. Two months later I developed a truly horrible skin condition, with itchy painful oozing thickened red patches of skin. It lasted all summer, about three months... luckily it was summer break and I was out of school at that time. This was years ago and it is still the worst health problem I've ever had. I would 1000 times out of 1000 choose a few days of measles over this torture. At the time I knew absolutely nothing about vaccines or vaccine damage, and I did not make the connection until years later... after getting other poison vaccines like Anthrax in the military, but that's another story.
Luckily I eventually learned the truth about this wonderful medical miracle before 'covid' so my stand was already 'absolutely no way in hell' on the 'covid' vaccines (or any other vaccine ever again).
I am unfortunately fully vaxxed since my childhood since my parents never thought to question vaccines or anything the doctor told them.
I don’t remember this myself because I was too young at the time, but my mother told me that I used to suffer from horrible migraines as a young child. They’d get to bad that they thought that I must be suffering from some brain tumors or something. I have a fuzzy memory of spending endless appointments in the doctor’s office where they did every test imaginable to try and figure out what was causing these migraines. They were never able to figure it out and eventually the migraines went away on their own.
I started thinking about those migraines again during convid (after my eyes were opened to the scam) and while I obviously can’t prove that they were caused by either of the vaccines I received as a child, I can’t help but wonder if they are connected anyway. After all, they only started happening after I started receiving the vaccines, never before.
To the great dismay of my mother, I’ve refused every vaccine since then. Not because I thought there was anything wrong with them but because my gut kept telling me to not get them. After looking at the aftermath of the HPV and swine flu jabs, it seems like my gut knew long before I did. I walked into convid with no intention of getting jabbed for that either for the same reason. Fast forward a few years and I’m really glad I listened to my gut even long before my eyes were open to what was going on.
Well done for listening to your gut, which is your inner guidance.
If only more people trusted themselves, but of course we're taught to 'trust the experts' not ourselves, for obvious reasons.
I truly believe the tables are turning though.
People who watch TV: "So we have this thing called 'adverts' which is when they try to sell us products we don't need with a cheesy sales pitch which plays on our emotions, and sometimes they include clips of people in lab coats to try and make it look all 'sciency' and credible..... and then we have this other thing called 'the news'"
People who do their own research and go for long walks: "Yeah, it's pretty much adverts all the way down...."
Hi Dawn. He didn't mention efficacy and I listened very carefully. I assume that the same argument he used against assumptions of safety would apply.
Thanks. If that is the case then he hasn't looked very deeply into the history of vaccination and the germ theory. But that's ok. If he's questioning it all, then he will at least be helping to spread 'vaccine hesitancy'.
I think you are right that he still believes in viral transmission of illnesses. But his new career as a film maker is dedicated to warning the public against vaccine harms.
Hi Dawn. Andrew Wakefield has recently confirmed that no Vax is safe based on the fact there have never been comparable placebo trials for any Vax. See his discussion with Dr Malik on Rumble/Odyssey.
That is interesting, thank you for letting me know.
He seems to have changed his position recently, because I heard/read not that long ago that he was still in favour of single vaccines, which is the point I was making in the article.
However, saying that no vax is safe is not the same as saying that no vax is effective. Do you know his view on their alleged effectiveness? That would also be interesting.
Stefan Lanka was my greatest teacher about how virologists have deceived themselves with flawed methodologies.
But as for his court case -- seriously, he won on appeal based on something administrative.
"On February 16, 2016, the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) re-evaluated the first ruling,
judging that Dr. Bardens did not meet the criteria since he failed to provide proof for the existence of
the measles virus presented in one publication, as asked by Dr. Lanka in his announcement.
Therefore, Dr. Lanka does not have to pay the prize money."
Bardens' submitted 6 papers and Lanka only asked for 1.
So, legally, and technically, the Court did not admit or confirm that the measles virus has not been proven to exist.
However, "According to the minutes of the court proceedings (page 7/ first paragraph), Andreas
Podbielski, head of the Department of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene at the University
Hospital in Rostock, who was one of the appointed experts at the trial, stated that even though the
existence of the measles virus could be concluded from the summary of the six papers submitted by
Dr. Bardens, none of the authors had conducted any controlled experiments in accordance with
internationally defined rules and principles of good scientific practice (see also the method of “indirect
evidence”)."
The link to the above: https://learninggnm.com/documents/Lanka_Bardens_Trial_E.pdf
My link to the German Court's own documents about the case >> https://lrbw.juris.de/cgi-bin/laender_rechtsprechung/document.py?Gericht=bw&GerichtAuswahl=Oberlandesgerichte&Art=en&sid=46bf3db2df690aba6e4874acafaf45b6&nr=20705&pos=0&anz=1 >> NO LONGER WORKS. It looks like they scrubbed it. Apparently, since I last checked the link, they've updated their policy: "The collection contained here contains decisions from the Baden-Württemberg courts that are worthy of publication."
THE SUMMER OF DIED SUDDENLY. A man reluctantly takes the jab in order to see his mother in a nursing home. Share Turfseer’s new song far and wide. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-summer-of-died-suddenly
I began studying measles in 2016 following the so-called 2014–2015 Disneyland outbreak. That outbreak of 42 cases occurred in December 2014. By February of the next year, two months later, there were 110 cases in California. There also were cases in other states.
From my notes:
A journal article at https://jcm.asm.org/content/55/3/735 stated
“During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees.” and “Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences.” This appeared in the November 2016 issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology, the article title is “Rapid Identification of Measles Virus Vaccine Genotype by Real-Time PCR.”
This means:
(1) many-to-most of the “suspected” cases were people who had been recently vaccinated for measles.
(2) 73 out of 194 (38%) of the measles cases were infected by the measles virus present in the vaccine, in other words the vaccine caused the infection.
Measles was orignally diagnosed based on symptoms. By 2015 the CDC required genotyping as a part of the diagnostics. Genotyping is done with a PCR test (!). 24 genotypes had been detected by 2019, they do not reflect strict geographical distribution, which is to say that most have been found in more than one geographical region. Furthermore, “in some populations, complete shifts in the genotype of the strain of measles circulating in the population have been observed, with given genotypes being replaced by new genotypes” [BioMed Central http://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2334-8-44 ]
Thanks to the COVID story, I am very suspicious of any diagnostic use of the PCR test. The determination of clades and genotypes is interesting, but ultimately useless.
Vaccinologists love to believe in the concept of “herd immunity”, by which they mean that if enough people are vaccinated, then everyone will be “safe” from getting an infection. The herd immunity for measles started out at, as I recall, at 70%. It has been increased every time an inexplicable outbreak challenged the theory. Now it is 95%. I am not the only one to conclude herd immunity is a pipe dream.
Herd immunity is not just a pipe dream, it's complete nonsense because it's based on a false model of how the body works and what 'disease' really is.
I am sure you are correct. I thought it was an excuse for why vaccination did not stop people from getting the subject disease. The more I studied the 2015 California measles "outbreak", the more I suspected the official story was wrong - too many observations that did not "fit" the medical explanation.
BTW, I have your book and appreciate it greatly.
Thank you.
Yes, there are so many observations that don't fit the mainstream narrative. That became so clear during my research for the book.
It would be really interesting to see a comparison. What are your chances of getting any of these alleged viral diseases they are trying to terrorize us over and having one of these extreme responses leading to death, compared to your chances of getting a CONVID 'vaccine' and having a side effect leading to death.
That would be interesting to see, but I very much doubt if that study will be performed by the mainstream medical system.
For sure the mainstream won't be doing it. Or if there are still some good, honest scientists who have somehow survived despite the system if they did a study like that it would never be published. But I think the statistics are already there (although everything is tainted of course), so it's just a matter of doing the math on those