I did the marketing campaign for Rogaine. It grew hair for balding men. The percentage of success was in the low 20's. At least at that time a product did not need to work even one in four times to pass the FDA. The placebo group had a 17% success rate. I remember thinking at the time that the R&D money should be spent on the placebo effect and not more drugs.
Interesting tweet from Dr David Cartland, Penzance:
"People are realising the reasons for their chronic ill health. The sudden cancer in their friends and family. The blood clot that killed their nephew. The stroke in their 30 year old sister. And the reasons to the likely cause of their spouses and families premature death!!
NHS staff…….You can run but you cannot hide!! Time is short do the right thing I implore and beg you!!! National health service or national wealth service???"
1. More data gathering of us all, with the tests ?.
2. Wonder if the new "anti-cancer" jab being trialled has anything to do with it ?.
He is probably right when we see this info, that King Charles cancer is probably a Psyop to get fools to take the new "miracle" poison. ? Let see if he is cancer free after a while.
Will they force us to have it? Force? I can’t see that happening. Will they scare the sheet out of everyone to make them line up for it? They already know they can accomplish that.
Makes me wonder if their up and coming
Disease X will be “cancer”?
Since that already scares people.
All they need to do is push the fact that it’s the type of cancer that’s contagious
Just a little off topic; the UK press are now stating that you can catch Alzheimers from your partner, dentist and blah blah.... sonothing would surprise me... and the muppets will buy into it.
Oh no it's not; it's the MSM... so everything is true .... lol
"When news broke last week that Alzheimer's could spread from person to person, experts immediately rushed to reassure the public that there was 'no cause for concern'.
BUT IF YOU COMBINE THE NEXT PARA, you get ....
"When news broke last week that Alzheimer's could spread from person to person, experts immediately rushed to reassure the public that there was 'no cause for concern'.
A study had found five people who'd been injected with now-banned growth treatments in the 1980s had gone on to develop early-onset dementia. The drugs, which contained hormones taken from corpses, had been contaminated with toxic amyloid proteins – the 'seeds' of Alzheimer's."
"One of the first studies to document the link between gum disease, tooth loss and Alzheimer’s disease focused on a cohort of aging nuns who were part of a larger study on aging. Researchers tracked 144 of the nuns and found that severe tooth loss was associated with dementia risk up to 6.4 times higher than compared with those who lost fewer teeth."
(not that they get a brain disease and say forget to brush their teeth)
Omg Dawn, I was just telling someone an hour ago how when I worked at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), towards the end I was dedicated to working (as biostatistician... which seems like another lifetime now) with a group of 4 urologists who spoke nonstop about PSA. PSA, PSA, PSA. I always felt uneasy and thought someone is making a lot of money off these PSA tests. I was assigned a project or 2 involving PSA, and didn't see why they were so focused on it.
So I sent a group email to all 4 of them plus a fellow who was working with them, asking for the foundation evidence that PSA was a useful marker. Crickets. I followed up. Crickets, except the fellow finally sent me a study or 2, admitting that they didn't actually establish anything but were the closest he could find. He also told me once that he personally would never take any cancer screening test!
Thank you for sharing that Christine. It's really interesting to know that people in the system wouldn't take the screening tests, well some of them at least. Do you think they know something that the public doesn't get to hear?
Many do seem to still be fully immersed in their belief in the system, sadly.
I was still pretty naïve myself back then, so was surprised to hear the fellow say this. I asked him why and I forget his exact answer but it was something to the effect that taking a test would be looking for trouble and he'd rather not know if he had cancer. It made me think he wasn't very invested in the framework of the establishment!
It also shows he doesn't/didn't understand how the body works and what 'disease' actually is. But that lack of understanding is pervasive within the mainstream medical system and, to a certain extent, the 'alternative' health system.
I'm with you Dawn, and as ever you have analyzed and written this is to a degree well beyond what I could, so I don't have much. Every time I see something about this alleged 'cancer' that King Charles has it sends up all my red flags. I don't believe it at all, not with the money and technologies that the Royal family has access to. I would go so far as to say, in my opinion, that King Charles IS a cancer, on this planet and to the human race.
It's possible that there are more aspects to this story than I've covered in this article. If so, I'll do a follow up at some stage when I've found the pieces of the puzzle that I need for it.
Yes indeed: more fear of the Big C; more trust in the NHS - who are still trying their damnedest to kill us with weaponised meds and vxxx; more diagnostic tests; more biological data collection; the normalisation of cancer, which is being heavily promoted across media; and potentially encouraging people to submit to even more experimental "Miracle" jabs to eradicate cancer.
There is a spike in cancers of all types from 2022...I think we know why that is.
Thank you for this Dawn. I grew up with the consensus Canadian belief that we were lucky or even superior for having paid-for medicare. Now I can see what a scam it is. Tons of money forced out of our pockets into Pharma's. I get reminders by mail to get screened for cancer, get pap tests etc.. And if I walk into the clinic, to get my ears cleaned for example, I'm shocked at the amount of vaccine (Covid and flu) propaganda. It's horrific. The nurses are super nice but they know nothing and the doctors are clueless and jaded - waiting to retire probably.
Thank you Nina. I'm sure many people in that system are really good people who went into it with good intentions, it's the system that's at fault because, as you know, it's not based on how the body actually works.
1) Some breast cancers should never be found because they resolve themselves.
2) some witch doctors can actually kill a person by scaring him to death
It’s always wrong to rely on any other information than sources that have been found from experience to be trustworthy. Always keep a measured approach and be prepared.
A friend of mine who is an emergency medicine doctor is still on the fence about our "no-virus" reality. It's still too hard of a pill for him to swallow right now, yet he's getting there slowly. (He wouldn't dare admit this to any other doctor that he works with though!)
However, he will be the first one to tell you that breast cancer is the mother of all scams. He describes a system where doctors basically scare the living hell out of women, then do a bunch of expensive "testing", then inform them that they "might" have something, and finally the knives come out.
"Better safe than sorry" is the most common phrase used by doctor's to "justify" this fraud. Additionally, many women are essentially bribed with a free boob job at the same time, (our health insurance HAS to pay for that too...but only if you have "breast cancer" diagnosed first!) And viola, you're insurance just coughed up another $250K to the medical establishment!
By highlighting the massive frauds within the cancer industry, we can also help lead people to the no-virus truth. Thanks for this logical analysis.
I don't see him as being at all important, but many people still do, which means they will be following this story and believe that he is trying to help.
What a shill that man is ( he is not my king) all done to see how compliant our little sheeples called men are, next move go get your anti- cancer vaccine!!! Sickening comes to mind 😡
Yes, I have watched this speech, but thanks. William - agree with and I do not underestimate Harry as part and parcel as well ... catering for the anti-monarchists.
Every time I read or hear someone say mortality went up during the lockdowns because people couldn't get appointments or screenings, I think, NO! If anything, more lives were spared because of missed appointments & screenings. And I mean that sincerely.
Do y'all take for granted what the Establishment calls "cancer"?
Are you sure the cancer screenings & tests are not as fake as the HIV scam-tests?
Do y'all assume that cancer rates are up because of toxins in the environment, medicines, and foods?
Or are cancer rates up because of fake tests and actually, no, there isn't any increase in goddamn organic cancer rates?
What if you did not have cancer but took a test that said you had cancer, and then started chemotherapy for the cancer you did not have, and then the chemotherapy caused actual cancer and fried your liver, and thus, you really did die from cancer? Well, that would explain an increase in cancer deaths, wouldn't it?
Hey now, "they" wouldn't create fake cancer screenings & tests just to trick you into killing your body with radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy, would they? But the doctors & nurses seem so nice & kind & "educated"....No, it's not possible! Never in a million years! People couldn't possibly be so horribly miseducated.
Do the HIV tests still exist?
Are people still being diagnosed with "AIDS"?
Are people still being treated for HIV?
Was HIV ever proven to exist? Even in a petri dish?
I thought Charles was into homeopathic medicine? Strange that he would succumb to surgery...
Thank you Dawn. Very sound reasoning.
I did the marketing campaign for Rogaine. It grew hair for balding men. The percentage of success was in the low 20's. At least at that time a product did not need to work even one in four times to pass the FDA. The placebo group had a 17% success rate. I remember thinking at the time that the R&D money should be spent on the placebo effect and not more drugs.
Interesting tweet from Dr David Cartland, Penzance:
"People are realising the reasons for their chronic ill health. The sudden cancer in their friends and family. The blood clot that killed their nephew. The stroke in their 30 year old sister. And the reasons to the likely cause of their spouses and families premature death!!
NHS staff…….You can run but you cannot hide!! Time is short do the right thing I implore and beg you!!! National health service or national wealth service???"
https://twitter.com/CartlandDavid/status/1755659911109767605
I agree that they should 'do the right thing' if that means to be honest about what they are seeing.
At the same time, I believe people need to understand that the solution is not merely to 'improve' the NHS
He is described as a NHS 'whistleblower'. Here is another tweet where he quotes a colleague:
"We were pushed to take the vaccine and declined! Our jobs threatened and all colleagues turned their back on us !
We were moments from loosing our jobs until the mandatory vaccines withdrawn !
They are still moving around the hospital trying to give the vaccine !
Everyone so frightened to discuss it because most have had the jab ! Others don’t want to start the conversation and are scared of the consequences!
So frightened for the future"
https://twitter.com/CartlandDavid/status/1755562951354789956
I am banned from Twitter so I cannot check the rest of his feed but it seems he is advocating the exposure of a criminal system...and not before time.
I have seen a few video posts of his addressing his colleagues.
Very good, thanks. A couple of my thoughts:
1. More data gathering of us all, with the tests ?.
2. Wonder if the new "anti-cancer" jab being trialled has anything to do with it ?.
He is probably right when we see this info, that King Charles cancer is probably a Psyop to get fools to take the new "miracle" poison. ? Let see if he is cancer free after a while.
= https://odysee.com/@JackFrostExperience:c/1707295262f7548-360:3
That's a good point.
I'd say that encouraging men to take the vax would be part of the strategy. But they need to get them scared and go for a check-up first.
Agreed and we know how the masses do love their tests (PCR, Lateral flow etc) now; especially when scared !.
PS Forgot one link= https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-09-28/qld-pfizer-buys-uq-start-upresapp-health-covid/101478832
Just the start !.
Good point Bob.
I read somewhere that it was Moderna that was coming out with some kind of cancer jab.
The madness with jabs will never stop.
The people are too brainwashed and indoctrinated with the false belief that the concept of vaccination is valid.
It is not and never has been since it’s inception
https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/5-huge-historical-vaccine-frauds
Yes, Moderna it is as shown here = https://odysee.com/@JackFrostExperience:c/1707295262f7548-360:3
But they will all be out with it soon... but will they then force us to have it, with the new "WHO PANDEMIC TREATY ?.".....
PS Nice link, thanks.
Will they force us to have it? Force? I can’t see that happening. Will they scare the sheet out of everyone to make them line up for it? They already know they can accomplish that.
Makes me wonder if their up and coming
Disease X will be “cancer”?
Since that already scares people.
All they need to do is push the fact that it’s the type of cancer that’s contagious
Cha-Ching! Cha-Ching! Cha-Ching!
That's another reason why the 'no virus' issue is so important - so that people don't fall for the idea that cancer is contagious.
Just a little off topic; the UK press are now stating that you can catch Alzheimers from your partner, dentist and blah blah.... sonothing would surprise me... and the muppets will buy into it.
That's beyond crazy!!
Oh no it's not; it's the MSM... so everything is true .... lol
"When news broke last week that Alzheimer's could spread from person to person, experts immediately rushed to reassure the public that there was 'no cause for concern'.
BUT IF YOU COMBINE THE NEXT PARA, you get ....
"When news broke last week that Alzheimer's could spread from person to person, experts immediately rushed to reassure the public that there was 'no cause for concern'.
A study had found five people who'd been injected with now-banned growth treatments in the 1980s had gone on to develop early-onset dementia. The drugs, which contained hormones taken from corpses, had been contaminated with toxic amyloid proteins – the 'seeds' of Alzheimer's."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13041711/evidence-Alzheimers-dentist.html
....
It gets better
"One of the first studies to document the link between gum disease, tooth loss and Alzheimer’s disease focused on a cohort of aging nuns who were part of a larger study on aging. Researchers tracked 144 of the nuns and found that severe tooth loss was associated with dementia risk up to 6.4 times higher than compared with those who lost fewer teeth."
(not that they get a brain disease and say forget to brush their teeth)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2023/09/21/teeth-gums-oral-health-dementia-alzheimers/
...
Just search for it, because it is becoming more ludicrous by the day ... for me cover ups or diversions from the adverse effects of the jab.
Omg Dawn, I was just telling someone an hour ago how when I worked at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), towards the end I was dedicated to working (as biostatistician... which seems like another lifetime now) with a group of 4 urologists who spoke nonstop about PSA. PSA, PSA, PSA. I always felt uneasy and thought someone is making a lot of money off these PSA tests. I was assigned a project or 2 involving PSA, and didn't see why they were so focused on it.
So I sent a group email to all 4 of them plus a fellow who was working with them, asking for the foundation evidence that PSA was a useful marker. Crickets. I followed up. Crickets, except the fellow finally sent me a study or 2, admitting that they didn't actually establish anything but were the closest he could find. He also told me once that he personally would never take any cancer screening test!
Thank you for sharing that Christine. It's really interesting to know that people in the system wouldn't take the screening tests, well some of them at least. Do you think they know something that the public doesn't get to hear?
Many do seem to still be fully immersed in their belief in the system, sadly.
I was still pretty naïve myself back then, so was surprised to hear the fellow say this. I asked him why and I forget his exact answer but it was something to the effect that taking a test would be looking for trouble and he'd rather not know if he had cancer. It made me think he wasn't very invested in the framework of the establishment!
It also shows he doesn't/didn't understand how the body works and what 'disease' actually is. But that lack of understanding is pervasive within the mainstream medical system and, to a certain extent, the 'alternative' health system.
There are so many layers to it all, aren't there?
Indeed :)
Tha Amish seem to be doing OK without 'modern medicine' - must just have 'good genes' I guess.
I'm with you Dawn, and as ever you have analyzed and written this is to a degree well beyond what I could, so I don't have much. Every time I see something about this alleged 'cancer' that King Charles has it sends up all my red flags. I don't believe it at all, not with the money and technologies that the Royal family has access to. I would go so far as to say, in my opinion, that King Charles IS a cancer, on this planet and to the human race.
Thank you, Donna.
It's possible that there are more aspects to this story than I've covered in this article. If so, I'll do a follow up at some stage when I've found the pieces of the puzzle that I need for it.
Actually, they really don't know us too well... Their psychological experiments were inaccurate because they had bad methods just like virology does.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/looking-behind-the-curtain-of-oz
It also explains why they are so poor at propaganda...
https://robc137.substack.com/p/looking-behind-the-curtain-of-oz
They don't know those of us who don't comply, I agree.
Yes indeed: more fear of the Big C; more trust in the NHS - who are still trying their damnedest to kill us with weaponised meds and vxxx; more diagnostic tests; more biological data collection; the normalisation of cancer, which is being heavily promoted across media; and potentially encouraging people to submit to even more experimental "Miracle" jabs to eradicate cancer.
There is a spike in cancers of all types from 2022...I think we know why that is.
Thank you for this Dawn. I grew up with the consensus Canadian belief that we were lucky or even superior for having paid-for medicare. Now I can see what a scam it is. Tons of money forced out of our pockets into Pharma's. I get reminders by mail to get screened for cancer, get pap tests etc.. And if I walk into the clinic, to get my ears cleaned for example, I'm shocked at the amount of vaccine (Covid and flu) propaganda. It's horrific. The nurses are super nice but they know nothing and the doctors are clueless and jaded - waiting to retire probably.
Thank you Nina. I'm sure many people in that system are really good people who went into it with good intentions, it's the system that's at fault because, as you know, it's not based on how the body actually works.
Spot on. Two things come to mind:
1) Some breast cancers should never be found because they resolve themselves.
2) some witch doctors can actually kill a person by scaring him to death
It’s always wrong to rely on any other information than sources that have been found from experience to be trustworthy. Always keep a measured approach and be prepared.
I read that the discoverer of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) said PSA
was NOT a indicator of prostate cancer...
To paraphrase that 1960s folksinger:
"Dont follow leaders
watch out for disease markers !"
Disease markers. Health markers. Medical markers. Exam markers...
Nice tidy disease categories with their tell-tale Markers...
0ne-size-fits-all medicine for lobotomised medical doctors -
makes the job easier...
Yes, it's all about 'markers', but there's no evidence that the markers are indicative of 'disease'.
I'm not knowledgeable enough, and my Scientific bent
is slight, but i do wonder why the discoverer called it an
'antigen' - for even with my limited understanding that word
is a clear pointer (marker) to disease...
Excellent Article!
A friend of mine who is an emergency medicine doctor is still on the fence about our "no-virus" reality. It's still too hard of a pill for him to swallow right now, yet he's getting there slowly. (He wouldn't dare admit this to any other doctor that he works with though!)
However, he will be the first one to tell you that breast cancer is the mother of all scams. He describes a system where doctors basically scare the living hell out of women, then do a bunch of expensive "testing", then inform them that they "might" have something, and finally the knives come out.
"Better safe than sorry" is the most common phrase used by doctor's to "justify" this fraud. Additionally, many women are essentially bribed with a free boob job at the same time, (our health insurance HAS to pay for that too...but only if you have "breast cancer" diagnosed first!) And viola, you're insurance just coughed up another $250K to the medical establishment!
By highlighting the massive frauds within the cancer industry, we can also help lead people to the no-virus truth. Thanks for this logical analysis.
There's a lot of "hesitancy" accepting the facts / truth about the
non-existence of 'viruses'...Taking The Jab on the basis "It's better
safe than sorry !" expresses not only hesitancy, but is also an
admission of ignorance...Any medical doctor who offers such
"advice' should be radically avoided...
And the importance of the king is what?
I don't see him as being at all important, but many people still do, which means they will be following this story and believe that he is trying to help.
What a shill that man is ( he is not my king) all done to see how compliant our little sheeples called men are, next move go get your anti- cancer vaccine!!! Sickening comes to mind 😡
I don't believe a word of it. William is WEF and they want him on the throne ASAP.
? Charles is a head honcho of the WEF and was the one that actually announced "The Great Reset".... but no, I do not believe it either.
https://odysee.com/@JackFrostExperience:c/1707295262f7548-360:3
Charles has been at the helm of the Green movement since the 80s.
He is currently President of WWF-UK.
20 June 2020:
Klaus Schwab and Prince Charles on why we need a Great Reset - listen to the podcast.
They have known each other for decades.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/06/the-great-reset-this-weeks-world-vs-virus-podcast/
Having said that, Prince William (born on Summer Solstice, 21 June 1982) is clearly being groomed for big things.
Yes, I have watched this speech, but thanks. William - agree with and I do not underestimate Harry as part and parcel as well ... catering for the anti-monarchists.
Yes Divide and Conquer extends to the Royals.
Every time I read or hear someone say mortality went up during the lockdowns because people couldn't get appointments or screenings, I think, NO! If anything, more lives were spared because of missed appointments & screenings. And I mean that sincerely.
Do y'all take for granted what the Establishment calls "cancer"?
Are you sure the cancer screenings & tests are not as fake as the HIV scam-tests?
Do y'all assume that cancer rates are up because of toxins in the environment, medicines, and foods?
Or are cancer rates up because of fake tests and actually, no, there isn't any increase in goddamn organic cancer rates?
What if you did not have cancer but took a test that said you had cancer, and then started chemotherapy for the cancer you did not have, and then the chemotherapy caused actual cancer and fried your liver, and thus, you really did die from cancer? Well, that would explain an increase in cancer deaths, wouldn't it?
Hey now, "they" wouldn't create fake cancer screenings & tests just to trick you into killing your body with radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy, would they? But the doctors & nurses seem so nice & kind & "educated"....No, it's not possible! Never in a million years! People couldn't possibly be so horribly miseducated.
Do the HIV tests still exist?
Are people still being diagnosed with "AIDS"?
Are people still being treated for HIV?
Was HIV ever proven to exist? Even in a petri dish?
I thought Charles was into homeopathic medicine? Strange that he would succumb to surgery...