The latest media reports state that King Charles has cancer. This is a surprising revelation considering his recent seemingly successful treatment for an enlarged prostate, as reported in an article on January 26th entitled King Charles ‘doing well’ after prostate treatment
I did the marketing campaign for Rogaine. It grew hair for balding men. The percentage of success was in the low 20's. At least at that time a product did not need to work even one in four times to pass the FDA. The placebo group had a 17% success rate. I remember thinking at the time that the R&D money should be spent on the placebo effect and not more drugs.
Interesting tweet from Dr David Cartland, Penzance:
"People are realising the reasons for their chronic ill health. The sudden cancer in their friends and family. The blood clot that killed their nephew. The stroke in their 30 year old sister. And the reasons to the likely cause of their spouses and families premature death!!
NHS staff…….You can run but you cannot hide!! Time is short do the right thing I implore and beg you!!! National health service or national wealth service???"
1. More data gathering of us all, with the tests ?.
2. Wonder if the new "anti-cancer" jab being trialled has anything to do with it ?.
He is probably right when we see this info, that King Charles cancer is probably a Psyop to get fools to take the new "miracle" poison. ? Let see if he is cancer free after a while.
Omg Dawn, I was just telling someone an hour ago how when I worked at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), towards the end I was dedicated to working (as biostatistician... which seems like another lifetime now) with a group of 4 urologists who spoke nonstop about PSA. PSA, PSA, PSA. I always felt uneasy and thought someone is making a lot of money off these PSA tests. I was assigned a project or 2 involving PSA, and didn't see why they were so focused on it.
So I sent a group email to all 4 of them plus a fellow who was working with them, asking for the foundation evidence that PSA was a useful marker. Crickets. I followed up. Crickets, except the fellow finally sent me a study or 2, admitting that they didn't actually establish anything but were the closest he could find. He also told me once that he personally would never take any cancer screening test!
I'm with you Dawn, and as ever you have analyzed and written this is to a degree well beyond what I could, so I don't have much. Every time I see something about this alleged 'cancer' that King Charles has it sends up all my red flags. I don't believe it at all, not with the money and technologies that the Royal family has access to. I would go so far as to say, in my opinion, that King Charles IS a cancer, on this planet and to the human race.
Yes indeed: more fear of the Big C; more trust in the NHS - who are still trying their damnedest to kill us with weaponised meds and vxxx; more diagnostic tests; more biological data collection; the normalisation of cancer, which is being heavily promoted across media; and potentially encouraging people to submit to even more experimental "Miracle" jabs to eradicate cancer.
There is a spike in cancers of all types from 2022...I think we know why that is.
Thank you for this Dawn. I grew up with the consensus Canadian belief that we were lucky or even superior for having paid-for medicare. Now I can see what a scam it is. Tons of money forced out of our pockets into Pharma's. I get reminders by mail to get screened for cancer, get pap tests etc.. And if I walk into the clinic, to get my ears cleaned for example, I'm shocked at the amount of vaccine (Covid and flu) propaganda. It's horrific. The nurses are super nice but they know nothing and the doctors are clueless and jaded - waiting to retire probably.
1) Some breast cancers should never be found because they resolve themselves.
2) some witch doctors can actually kill a person by scaring him to death
It’s always wrong to rely on any other information than sources that have been found from experience to be trustworthy. Always keep a measured approach and be prepared.
A friend of mine who is an emergency medicine doctor is still on the fence about our "no-virus" reality. It's still too hard of a pill for him to swallow right now, yet he's getting there slowly. (He wouldn't dare admit this to any other doctor that he works with though!)
However, he will be the first one to tell you that breast cancer is the mother of all scams. He describes a system where doctors basically scare the living hell out of women, then do a bunch of expensive "testing", then inform them that they "might" have something, and finally the knives come out.
"Better safe than sorry" is the most common phrase used by doctor's to "justify" this fraud. Additionally, many women are essentially bribed with a free boob job at the same time, (our health insurance HAS to pay for that too...but only if you have "breast cancer" diagnosed first!) And viola, you're insurance just coughed up another $250K to the medical establishment!
By highlighting the massive frauds within the cancer industry, we can also help lead people to the no-virus truth. Thanks for this logical analysis.
What a shill that man is ( he is not my king) all done to see how compliant our little sheeples called men are, next move go get your anti- cancer vaccine!!! Sickening comes to mind 😡
Every time I read or hear someone say mortality went up during the lockdowns because people couldn't get appointments or screenings, I think, NO! If anything, more lives were spared because of missed appointments & screenings. And I mean that sincerely.
Do y'all take for granted what the Establishment calls "cancer"?
Are you sure the cancer screenings & tests are not as fake as the HIV scam-tests?
Do y'all assume that cancer rates are up because of toxins in the environment, medicines, and foods?
Or are cancer rates up because of fake tests and actually, no, there isn't any increase in goddamn organic cancer rates?
What if you did not have cancer but took a test that said you had cancer, and then started chemotherapy for the cancer you did not have, and then the chemotherapy caused actual cancer and fried your liver, and thus, you really did die from cancer? Well, that would explain an increase in cancer deaths, wouldn't it?
Hey now, "they" wouldn't create fake cancer screenings & tests just to trick you into killing your body with radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy, would they? But the doctors & nurses seem so nice & kind & "educated"....No, it's not possible! Never in a million years! People couldn't possibly be so horribly miseducated.
Do the HIV tests still exist?
Are people still being diagnosed with "AIDS"?
Are people still being treated for HIV?
Was HIV ever proven to exist? Even in a petri dish?
I thought Charles was into homeopathic medicine? Strange that he would succumb to surgery...
Thank you Dawn. Very sound reasoning.
I did the marketing campaign for Rogaine. It grew hair for balding men. The percentage of success was in the low 20's. At least at that time a product did not need to work even one in four times to pass the FDA. The placebo group had a 17% success rate. I remember thinking at the time that the R&D money should be spent on the placebo effect and not more drugs.
Interesting tweet from Dr David Cartland, Penzance:
"People are realising the reasons for their chronic ill health. The sudden cancer in their friends and family. The blood clot that killed their nephew. The stroke in their 30 year old sister. And the reasons to the likely cause of their spouses and families premature death!!
NHS staff…….You can run but you cannot hide!! Time is short do the right thing I implore and beg you!!! National health service or national wealth service???"
https://twitter.com/CartlandDavid/status/1755659911109767605
Very good, thanks. A couple of my thoughts:
1. More data gathering of us all, with the tests ?.
2. Wonder if the new "anti-cancer" jab being trialled has anything to do with it ?.
He is probably right when we see this info, that King Charles cancer is probably a Psyop to get fools to take the new "miracle" poison. ? Let see if he is cancer free after a while.
= https://odysee.com/@JackFrostExperience:c/1707295262f7548-360:3
Omg Dawn, I was just telling someone an hour ago how when I worked at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), towards the end I was dedicated to working (as biostatistician... which seems like another lifetime now) with a group of 4 urologists who spoke nonstop about PSA. PSA, PSA, PSA. I always felt uneasy and thought someone is making a lot of money off these PSA tests. I was assigned a project or 2 involving PSA, and didn't see why they were so focused on it.
So I sent a group email to all 4 of them plus a fellow who was working with them, asking for the foundation evidence that PSA was a useful marker. Crickets. I followed up. Crickets, except the fellow finally sent me a study or 2, admitting that they didn't actually establish anything but were the closest he could find. He also told me once that he personally would never take any cancer screening test!
Tha Amish seem to be doing OK without 'modern medicine' - must just have 'good genes' I guess.
I'm with you Dawn, and as ever you have analyzed and written this is to a degree well beyond what I could, so I don't have much. Every time I see something about this alleged 'cancer' that King Charles has it sends up all my red flags. I don't believe it at all, not with the money and technologies that the Royal family has access to. I would go so far as to say, in my opinion, that King Charles IS a cancer, on this planet and to the human race.
Actually, they really don't know us too well... Their psychological experiments were inaccurate because they had bad methods just like virology does.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/looking-behind-the-curtain-of-oz
It also explains why they are so poor at propaganda...
https://robc137.substack.com/p/looking-behind-the-curtain-of-oz
Yes indeed: more fear of the Big C; more trust in the NHS - who are still trying their damnedest to kill us with weaponised meds and vxxx; more diagnostic tests; more biological data collection; the normalisation of cancer, which is being heavily promoted across media; and potentially encouraging people to submit to even more experimental "Miracle" jabs to eradicate cancer.
There is a spike in cancers of all types from 2022...I think we know why that is.
Thank you for this Dawn. I grew up with the consensus Canadian belief that we were lucky or even superior for having paid-for medicare. Now I can see what a scam it is. Tons of money forced out of our pockets into Pharma's. I get reminders by mail to get screened for cancer, get pap tests etc.. And if I walk into the clinic, to get my ears cleaned for example, I'm shocked at the amount of vaccine (Covid and flu) propaganda. It's horrific. The nurses are super nice but they know nothing and the doctors are clueless and jaded - waiting to retire probably.
Spot on. Two things come to mind:
1) Some breast cancers should never be found because they resolve themselves.
2) some witch doctors can actually kill a person by scaring him to death
It’s always wrong to rely on any other information than sources that have been found from experience to be trustworthy. Always keep a measured approach and be prepared.
I read that the discoverer of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) said PSA
was NOT a indicator of prostate cancer...
To paraphrase that 1960s folksinger:
"Dont follow leaders
watch out for disease markers !"
Disease markers. Health markers. Medical markers. Exam markers...
Nice tidy disease categories with their tell-tale Markers...
0ne-size-fits-all medicine for lobotomised medical doctors -
makes the job easier...
Excellent Article!
A friend of mine who is an emergency medicine doctor is still on the fence about our "no-virus" reality. It's still too hard of a pill for him to swallow right now, yet he's getting there slowly. (He wouldn't dare admit this to any other doctor that he works with though!)
However, he will be the first one to tell you that breast cancer is the mother of all scams. He describes a system where doctors basically scare the living hell out of women, then do a bunch of expensive "testing", then inform them that they "might" have something, and finally the knives come out.
"Better safe than sorry" is the most common phrase used by doctor's to "justify" this fraud. Additionally, many women are essentially bribed with a free boob job at the same time, (our health insurance HAS to pay for that too...but only if you have "breast cancer" diagnosed first!) And viola, you're insurance just coughed up another $250K to the medical establishment!
By highlighting the massive frauds within the cancer industry, we can also help lead people to the no-virus truth. Thanks for this logical analysis.
And the importance of the king is what?
What a shill that man is ( he is not my king) all done to see how compliant our little sheeples called men are, next move go get your anti- cancer vaccine!!! Sickening comes to mind 😡
I don't believe a word of it. William is WEF and they want him on the throne ASAP.
Every time I read or hear someone say mortality went up during the lockdowns because people couldn't get appointments or screenings, I think, NO! If anything, more lives were spared because of missed appointments & screenings. And I mean that sincerely.
Do y'all take for granted what the Establishment calls "cancer"?
Are you sure the cancer screenings & tests are not as fake as the HIV scam-tests?
Do y'all assume that cancer rates are up because of toxins in the environment, medicines, and foods?
Or are cancer rates up because of fake tests and actually, no, there isn't any increase in goddamn organic cancer rates?
What if you did not have cancer but took a test that said you had cancer, and then started chemotherapy for the cancer you did not have, and then the chemotherapy caused actual cancer and fried your liver, and thus, you really did die from cancer? Well, that would explain an increase in cancer deaths, wouldn't it?
Hey now, "they" wouldn't create fake cancer screenings & tests just to trick you into killing your body with radiation, surgery, and chemotherapy, would they? But the doctors & nurses seem so nice & kind & "educated"....No, it's not possible! Never in a million years! People couldn't possibly be so horribly miseducated.
Do the HIV tests still exist?
Are people still being diagnosed with "AIDS"?
Are people still being treated for HIV?
Was HIV ever proven to exist? Even in a petri dish?
I thought Charles was into homeopathic medicine? Strange that he would succumb to surgery...