I live in the US and just about every other commercial is for a harmacuetical. (I used to not watch TV but now I live with my boyfriend and his father. His dad has the TV going all hours). There are a couple different drugs for HIV. The one that is the funniest is a preventative one that states you must be tested before each dose 🤣 Sometimes I wonder what the believers think
The need for periodically triggering actions/reactions using preprogrammed words that are associated with F.E.A.R. But maybe we can read this propaganda the other way round: the plan is not working as planned; more and more people now have the instinct to stop after this kind of message for a second, refocus their thoughts, and discern better than before. The best for you and David!
Misha
Dr. Stefan Lanka: “In any case, no test can detect antibodies if the underlying body has never been detected.”
Thank you. 🙏 I tend to agree with you that the fear-mongering is increasing because people are not following the narrative as much as 'they' would like. People are becoming much more discerning.
HIV was a breakthrough in terms of health disinformation. For the first time, the public was convinced that there was a disease out there which could be affecting people without any visible symptoms which could only be determined via a lab test. And the public bought it.
This caused a seismic change in public social mores, raising fears of physical contacts with strangers to new heights. And it set the stage for "Operation Pandemic" which we are still living in.
HIV is but one hyped fear we are being bombarded with, taking turns with Bird Flu, the latest "COVID" variant, Monkeypox, Measles,..... Keep them scared, keep them dependent upon Big Pharma, keep them amenable to being herded into the global AI-managed Blockchain-based crypto-financed global digital panopticon,... for their own good.
Thanks for flagging up the malfeasant intents underlying the Starmer, THT, and NHS promotion of HIV testing.
I know from bitter (or sweet, if one considers all occurrences have reason in one's journey in life) experience it is absolutely imperative for mental well-being to never get tested for HIV (and the rest of them...viruses that is).
And this silent 'add-on' of blood sample taken from vulnerable (ill and anxious) people presenting in A&E is nothing but criminal.
Anyone believing (eg. older people still largely unconscious of the rampant HIV propaganda they lived through in the 1980's leaving psychological imprint). Anyone believing, to smallest degree, that HIV is actually a thing then a positive test will be a curse, a marauding blight upon their life.
I "lived with HIV" for 13years, (after got 'stung' by the 'HIV' test upon admission to a hospital in Nairobi with an infected leg)... assiduously taking the ARVs, modifying my lifestyle, feeling under the cosh. Not until my skepticism re the Convid operational roll-out in 2020 did I get urge to research more (including your book early on Dawn...ta)...and realise, slowly by slowly, the malign dynamics at play...and that I had been seriously scammed!
Nevertheless, as understanding is never complete, one requires to take a leap of faith/courage. I delayed, and lived with 'the elephant in the room' for 3 more years until finally mustered myself to drop the ARVs a year ago. Life goes on!
Now, all talk about 'HIV' is part of the parallel reality that has unfolded for me.
NB. The clue to a Truth is in that chosen phrase 'Living with' HIV. No other 'condition' or medical label has such appendage. So you don't 'have' HIV, you live with it. It is an experience dictated by belief in it. You live with it. You experience your delusion of it. As such, the 'Living with' appendage nicely displays for the propagators of the illusion a hidden handy circumvention of the evidence lack... lack of evidence for the theoretical construct of 'HIV' actually manifesting physically as any kind of material entity affecting our health
NEVER take THE 'HIV' tests....!
(and be highly skeptical about all tests!?...consider all are but approximations of 'truth')
Thank you. 🙏 Yes, the 'living with' label is ingenious, isn't it? It keeps people attached to something that is entirely meaningless, but most people fail to question it.
Yes and it is even more cunning as the acronym is PLWHA....so the H and A side by side maintains the illusion of the lurking flow of consequence...that if you are 'HIV', 'AIDs' (and death) is portent...if that is the word....ahead, and threatening any moment!
What year is it? Who doesn't know that HIV does not cause AIDS? Who knows that the HIV test does not indicate the presence of AIDS? For God's sake! AIDS was the warmup act for COVID.
You have to question the intelligence and objectives of politicians willing to undergo public HIV testing. Whose needs are they serving?
Sadly, I think there are still a lot of people who don't know that HIV is not harmful - or at least enough to justify this ridiculous propaganda campaign.
I did wonder if it was anything to do with the shenanigans at Davos. Seemed like a good idea for him to have a test for personal reasons - then he can dismiss it if "positive", but that's just me thinking a little too much. Husband thought it was a good idea for telling people the test is easy. Like WHAT!!!!! Ah well we've got as far as agreeing Starmer is a Mark Zist. Baby steps. Like someone else has said keep avoiding "tests". Believe nothing that they are trying to promote. He probably has money invested in it.
A world without poverty would be a desirable goal, but of course with the pressing question of how "poverty" is defined. Can poverty be abolished by abolishing ownership? Because I can't imagine it any other way, provided that "sustainability" continues to be a goal.
A world without "disease" is simply a goal for people with megalomaniac delusions . "Disease" is part of life, in humans, animals and plants, because it is part of a cycle of renewal.
Do we want to abolish "disease" by abolishing the sick subject? Because there is no other way. This automatically leads to euthanasia programmes, the emergence of which we are currently observing. Should "illness" be completely avoided through prophylaxis? This is only possible with comprehensive monitoring of all subjects who COULD "fall ill". We also see more surveillance everywhere, and the imposition of "therapies" aka "vaccinations". Creepy developments like Keir Starmer's public "HIV test" point the way.
Poverty is not about 'ownership' as such, although it is about who claims to have ownership.
As you say, 'disease' is not a thing in and of itself. Symptoms are the body's natural processes when the channels of elimination are not functioning optimally. So yes, control is gained by claiming to have the means to prevent 'disease', but we know that their methods will only contribute, never prevent.
Sending continuing gratitude to you, Dawn, for your continuing efforts to tear the veil of deception!
Epidemic.... they must mean the epidemic of stupidity.
With the world "establishment" there is always the next round of fearmongering.
Fear and desire are the control mechanisms of operation for the egoic/conditioned mind.
Maybe people need their fear caused by a lack of Self knowledge and seeing "others" where there are none, to be directed to imaginary things.
But on a positive note we are free to be who we are, which is not fearful.
Peace and love.
I live in the US and just about every other commercial is for a harmacuetical. (I used to not watch TV but now I live with my boyfriend and his father. His dad has the TV going all hours). There are a couple different drugs for HIV. The one that is the funniest is a preventative one that states you must be tested before each dose 🤣 Sometimes I wonder what the believers think
Excellent article, Dawn.
The need for periodically triggering actions/reactions using preprogrammed words that are associated with F.E.A.R. But maybe we can read this propaganda the other way round: the plan is not working as planned; more and more people now have the instinct to stop after this kind of message for a second, refocus their thoughts, and discern better than before. The best for you and David!
Misha
Dr. Stefan Lanka: “In any case, no test can detect antibodies if the underlying body has never been detected.”
Thank you. 🙏 I tend to agree with you that the fear-mongering is increasing because people are not following the narrative as much as 'they' would like. People are becoming much more discerning.
That's a great quote from Dr Lanka!
Thanks a lot, Dawn.
HIV was a breakthrough in terms of health disinformation. For the first time, the public was convinced that there was a disease out there which could be affecting people without any visible symptoms which could only be determined via a lab test. And the public bought it.
This caused a seismic change in public social mores, raising fears of physical contacts with strangers to new heights. And it set the stage for "Operation Pandemic" which we are still living in.
HIV is but one hyped fear we are being bombarded with, taking turns with Bird Flu, the latest "COVID" variant, Monkeypox, Measles,..... Keep them scared, keep them dependent upon Big Pharma, keep them amenable to being herded into the global AI-managed Blockchain-based crypto-financed global digital panopticon,... for their own good.
Thanks for flagging up the malfeasant intents underlying the Starmer, THT, and NHS promotion of HIV testing.
I know from bitter (or sweet, if one considers all occurrences have reason in one's journey in life) experience it is absolutely imperative for mental well-being to never get tested for HIV (and the rest of them...viruses that is).
And this silent 'add-on' of blood sample taken from vulnerable (ill and anxious) people presenting in A&E is nothing but criminal.
Anyone believing (eg. older people still largely unconscious of the rampant HIV propaganda they lived through in the 1980's leaving psychological imprint). Anyone believing, to smallest degree, that HIV is actually a thing then a positive test will be a curse, a marauding blight upon their life.
I "lived with HIV" for 13years, (after got 'stung' by the 'HIV' test upon admission to a hospital in Nairobi with an infected leg)... assiduously taking the ARVs, modifying my lifestyle, feeling under the cosh. Not until my skepticism re the Convid operational roll-out in 2020 did I get urge to research more (including your book early on Dawn...ta)...and realise, slowly by slowly, the malign dynamics at play...and that I had been seriously scammed!
Nevertheless, as understanding is never complete, one requires to take a leap of faith/courage. I delayed, and lived with 'the elephant in the room' for 3 more years until finally mustered myself to drop the ARVs a year ago. Life goes on!
Now, all talk about 'HIV' is part of the parallel reality that has unfolded for me.
NB. The clue to a Truth is in that chosen phrase 'Living with' HIV. No other 'condition' or medical label has such appendage. So you don't 'have' HIV, you live with it. It is an experience dictated by belief in it. You live with it. You experience your delusion of it. As such, the 'Living with' appendage nicely displays for the propagators of the illusion a hidden handy circumvention of the evidence lack... lack of evidence for the theoretical construct of 'HIV' actually manifesting physically as any kind of material entity affecting our health
NEVER take THE 'HIV' tests....!
(and be highly skeptical about all tests!?...consider all are but approximations of 'truth')
Thank you. 🙏 Yes, the 'living with' label is ingenious, isn't it? It keeps people attached to something that is entirely meaningless, but most people fail to question it.
Yes and it is even more cunning as the acronym is PLWHA....so the H and A side by side maintains the illusion of the lurking flow of consequence...that if you are 'HIV', 'AIDs' (and death) is portent...if that is the word....ahead, and threatening any moment!
'AIDS' does not really feature as part of the propaganda, although I'm sure most people do make that association.
What year is it? Who doesn't know that HIV does not cause AIDS? Who knows that the HIV test does not indicate the presence of AIDS? For God's sake! AIDS was the warmup act for COVID.
You have to question the intelligence and objectives of politicians willing to undergo public HIV testing. Whose needs are they serving?
Sadly, I think there are still a lot of people who don't know that HIV is not harmful - or at least enough to justify this ridiculous propaganda campaign.
And the common thread from then to now?
The Fauci.
I agree, although he is just the 'front man', not the one in control.
Great, they’re really determined to reach “net zero” (people) by 2030, eh?
It certainly seems that they are attempting to reduce the population size.
I did wonder if it was anything to do with the shenanigans at Davos. Seemed like a good idea for him to have a test for personal reasons - then he can dismiss it if "positive", but that's just me thinking a little too much. Husband thought it was a good idea for telling people the test is easy. Like WHAT!!!!! Ah well we've got as far as agreeing Starmer is a Mark Zist. Baby steps. Like someone else has said keep avoiding "tests". Believe nothing that they are trying to promote. He probably has money invested in it.
I wonder if his test will ever be processed. I doubt if he would take any of the 'meds' anyway, which is assuming he knows what's going on.
Yes, the 'test' is easy, it's the consequences of a 'positive' result that are dire for people.
A world without poverty would be a desirable goal, but of course with the pressing question of how "poverty" is defined. Can poverty be abolished by abolishing ownership? Because I can't imagine it any other way, provided that "sustainability" continues to be a goal.
A world without "disease" is simply a goal for people with megalomaniac delusions . "Disease" is part of life, in humans, animals and plants, because it is part of a cycle of renewal.
Do we want to abolish "disease" by abolishing the sick subject? Because there is no other way. This automatically leads to euthanasia programmes, the emergence of which we are currently observing. Should "illness" be completely avoided through prophylaxis? This is only possible with comprehensive monitoring of all subjects who COULD "fall ill". We also see more surveillance everywhere, and the imposition of "therapies" aka "vaccinations". Creepy developments like Keir Starmer's public "HIV test" point the way.
Poverty is not about 'ownership' as such, although it is about who claims to have ownership.
As you say, 'disease' is not a thing in and of itself. Symptoms are the body's natural processes when the channels of elimination are not functioning optimally. So yes, control is gained by claiming to have the means to prevent 'disease', but we know that their methods will only contribute, never prevent.
inthe mrna vax?